Google
Web www.netfamilynews.org
   toolbar


Online-Safety Resources for Home & School

Finding filtering & other software, Part 2: Insights from experts

"Filters are of only limited use with chat and instant-messaging," said Josh Finer, publisher of Software4Parents.com. For these communications apps so popular among tweens and teens, "monitoring software is better." Talking with Josh and Jerry Ropelato, publisher of InternetFilterReview.com, turned up some helpful insights - not just into what various types of online-safety software can do but also into parents' current interests. [See Part 1 for an introduction to their Web services.]

Josh's point about monitoring software suggests a shift in parents' concerns. A few years ago, when he started Software4Parents, Josh found that parents' No. 1 goal for buying filtering was to block online porn. Now it's just as much about contact as content - keeping strangers away from kids.

But every family's unique, he said in a recent phone interview. "Parents of a 13-year-old boy are more interested in filtering, while those of a 13-year-old girl are more interested in monitoring software," Josh said he's found. "For parents of younger kids, it's filtering." I asked him if parents give him or his customer service people that much detail, and he said definitely so. "They typically share their kids' ages. To be honest, I think they share too much information with me." It's clear there's a need to find the product that works best for each family's dynamics.

If filtering out "the bad stuff" is in your mix, the good news is, filters have gotten a lot better. "No product filters 100%, but I'd give the latest versions a 90%," said Josh, who's written online-safety software himself. [His accuracy rate is close to that of researchers at Australia's MacQuarie University, who said some filters are "getting about 87% success," Australian IT reports.]

Filter makers have also added some very useful beyond-filtering features. For example, "there's something called a privacy filter in NetNanny," Josh said. "You tell the software the child's name, address, etc., and if your child ever tries to communicate that information in an email or instant message, it appears as all x's at the other end." It's not talked about too much in advertising messages, he said, "but I think it's an excellent feature." The other filter he sells, CyberSitter, was PC Magazine's "Editor's Choice" in its latest annual review of this product category.

Another key feature, in Josh's view: time controls. They allow you to schedule when a child can have Web access, can chat or use other programs on the PC. "I'm hesitant to recommend anything without time and privacy controls," he said.

A key feature that InternetFilterReview.com's Jerry Ropelato looks for in a filtering product is whether it will identify file-sharing and other programs that kids tend to download onto their family's PCs - "will it give you a list of apps you may be concerned about?" is the question he asks.

But filters can't go beyond that basic ability to detect (IM or P2P) on a computer - they don't affect what's going on within those programs. "If a kid downloads an X-rated video [with file-sharing program like Kazaa or BitTorrent], there's nothing that'll detect [or block an in-coming video like that] in today's marketplace," Jerry said. "Most people don't even know porn exists on the P2P networks" (two US lawmakers brought this to public attention in the summer of 2001 - see my 8/3/01 lead feature and "File-sharing realities for families" ). What some filters can detect, using basic keyword technology, is what's in the text labels associated with porn images or videos, but some such files are intentionally mislabeled, so this is not a reliable safeguard.

Conflicts among various software products installed on a PC sometimes come up. Jerry pointed one out: "A lot of Net filters won't run with Norton anti-virus on their computers, and it's probably not the filters' fault." McAfee's anti-virus services probably work better with filtering.

What's important to remember, Jerry points out, is that "a lot of kids can find ways around almost any software protection anybody comes up with." For example, what wireless connecting "offers." "Kids can just go buy a $15 or $20 wireless card, install it, and use the next-door neighbors' router [if they have a wireless hub]." The oldest and most obvious work-around is simply leaving the house: no matter what precautions parents take at home, there's always a friend's house or libraries and other public places with fewer restrictions.

As for work-arounds for filtering software: "Years ago, kids could get around any [PC-based] filtering product. They really can't get around the top 3 now," Jerry said. On the other hand, Peacefire.org - an anti-filtering site that "represents the interests of people under 18 in the debate over freedom of speech on the Internet" - tells people how to circumvent all "censorware" by getting a friend with a filter-free PC to download its software called "Circumventor" so they can "get around all Web-blocking software."

And so the debate about filtering's effectiveness goes on. Which is why online-safety experts urge parents to stay engaged in their kids' online experiences and keep working with them to develop the best filter there ever was: the one that's installed between their ears!

More info

  Here's Part 1 of this little series.

 

Readers' comments on any of these resources are alsways welcome! Do email us via feedback@netfamilynews.org.


HOME | newsletter | subscribe | links | supporters | about | feedback


Copyright 2004 Net Family News, Inc. | Our Privacy Policy