• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

NetFamilyNews.org

Kid tech intel for everybody

Show Search
Hide Search
  • Home
  • Youth
  • Parenting
  • Literacy
  • Safety
  • Policy
  • Research
  • About NetFamilyNews.org
    • Supporters
    • Anne Collier’s Bio
    • Copyright
    • Privacy

40,000+ students polled on their Net use

October 3, 2008 By Anne Leave a Comment

The Rochester Institute of Technology refers to “a startling new reality of cybercrime,” but it’s much more about child and adolescent behavior than crime and it’s not a new reality. What’s unprecedented about this study is the size of its sample, 40,000+ children and teens, the way it breaks bullying and other online behaviors down by grade level, and the detail and number of its questions. Though it’s a local and not a nationwide sample (14 school districts in the Rochester area), it’s one that can be tracked from year to year – what researchers call a longitudinal study, which has obvious value. The RIT study also offers insights into parents’ and educators’ understanding of the situation.

Even the study’s lead author, RIT Graduate Program Coordinator Sam McQuade, acknowledges this is not new behavior: “What has traditionally happened on the playground has now moved into cyberspace,” he says in the study’s press release. “The major difference is that children have a sense that they’re anonymous and invincible online. Therefore, they seem to lash out in ways that they may not in person.”

Last week I heard Dr. McQuade present his research to the Internet Safety Technical Task Force at Harvard (see my post), unfortunately referring to children more in the language of law enforcement than of child development. But the study does, importantly, help advance society’s thinking about children’s online safety, which to date has focused almost entirely on youth victimization. With both positive and negative outcomes, young people are participants, if not shapers, of the social Web and therefore key stakeholders in their own well-being and in keeping the use of social media safe and civil.

Here’s a sampler of some key findings….

  • Grades K-1: “48% of K-1 students interact with people on Web sites” as opposed to various other devices and “48% reported viewing online content that made them feel uncomfortable,” with 72% reporting that to a grownup.
  • Grades 2-3: “Cyberbullying and victimization begins as early as the 2nd grade for some children” (McQuade told the Task Force that, at this grade level, “cyberbullying” means “someone was mean to me or I was mean to someone”). [See my post “Top 8 workarounds of kid virtual-world users.”].
  • Grades 4-6: 27% are “completely unsupervised when they go online,” and 7% reported being the victim of cyberbullying/threats,” most of those “by one of their peers.”
  • Grades 7-9: “59% of cyberbullying victims said their perpetrators were a friend they know in person…. The four types of middle-school online offenders are generalists, pirates, academic cheaters, and deceiving bullies.”
  • Grades 10-12: These students spend 15+ hours a week online; “16% have experienced cyberbullying, 17% have been embarrassed online, and 15% have been harassed or stalked online.” The “types of offenders in this age group,” McQuade told us, are “hackers, fraudsters, pornographers, deceiving bullies, data snoops, pirates, academic cheaters – the majority of kids are engaged in one of these forms of offending.”

    “I don’t know how you can get out in front of this thing,” Dr. McQuade told the Task Force, referring to the behaviors the study exposed (and “you” presumably being parents and educators). But I believe parents and educators have the knowledge and tools to help mitigate online peer harassment. How can I say that? Because this is about behavior, not technology. Together and separately at home and school, parents and educators have been dealing with behavior as long as there have been children! We have also known enough to bring in additional expertise when it’s needed – that of counselors, social workers, lawyers, and sometimes law enforcement. These days we sometimes need the help of school IT people, tech coordinators, computer forensics specialists, and social-networking customer service people too. But the expertise of caring, engaged parents and educators cannot be discounted, remains at the heart of the solution, and – as we think all this through together with our children and apply what we already know – can go a long way toward getting “getting out in front” of unruly online behavior as much as the offline kind.

    “Today’s children are most frequently preying on each other online – and their parents rarely have any idea it’s happening,” McQuade said. “Preying” is a strong word, but the study’s findings could be broken down this way: 1) that online bullying and harassment is the risk that affects a great many more youth than online predation does (it’s a little dated, but see “Predators vs. cyberbullies”), 2) that the young people it affects are mainstream youth – anybody’s kid – not the more marginalized youth who, research shows, are victimized by “predators” (see “Profile of a teen online victim”), and 3) that the line between the roles of bully and victim is very fine and crossed all the time (see the FL case in which the victim, who was unarguably bullied, had been harassing the kids who bullied her in IM). Sometimes bullying does turn into a crime, but the harassment often starts well before it has escalated into one; an incident is very rarely as clear-cut as the headlines make it out to be.

    Related links

  • Toward defining “cyberbullying” – followed by a response to and from author and researcher, Prof. Justin Patchin
  • The RIT study’s executive summary and the press release with a link to the full report in pdf format (alternate URL and pdf doc)
  • Earlier in NetFamilyNews: “Why schools, parents need to fight cyberbullying together” and many other NetFamilyNews posts on cyberbullying among these search results.
    Share Button
  • Filed Under: cyberbullying, Research, Risk & Safety Tagged With: online kids, RIT, Rochester Institute of Technology, Sam McQuade

    Reader Interactions

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Primary Sidebar

    NFN in your in-box:

    Anne Collier


    Bio and my...
    2016 TEDx Talk on
    the heart of digital citizenship

    Connect with me on LinkedIn
    See me on YouTube way back in 2011!

    IMPORTANT RESOURCES

    Our (DIGITAL) PARENTING BASICS: Safety + Social
    NAMLE, the National Association for Media Literacy Education
    CASEL.org & the 5 core social-emotional competencies of SEL
    Center for Democracy & Technology
    Center for Innovative Public Health Research
    Childnet International
    Committee for Children
    Congressional Internet Caucus Academy
    ConnectSafely.org
    Control Shift: a pivotal book for Internet safety
    Crimes Against Children Research Center
    Crisis Textline
    Cyber Civil Rights Initiative's Revenge Porn Crisis Line
    Cyberwise.org
    danah boyd's blog and book about networked youth
    Disconnected, Carrie James's book on digital ethics
    FOSI.org's Good Digital Parenting
    The research of Global Kids Online
    The Good Project at Harvard's School of Education
    If you watch nothing else: "Parenting in a Digital Age" TED Talk by Prof. Sonia Livingstone
    The International Bullying Prevention Association
    Let Grow Foundation
    Making Caring Common
    Raising Digital Natives, author Devorah Heitner's site
    Renee Hobbs at the Media Education Lab
    MediaSmarts.ca
    The New Media Literacies
    Report of the Aspen Task Force on Learning & the Internet and our guide to Creating Trusted Learning Environments
    The Ruler Approach to social-emotional learning (Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence)
    Sources of Strength
    "Young & Online: Perspectives on life in a digital age" from young people in 26 countries (via UNICEF)
    "Youth Safety on a Living Internet": 2010 report of the Online Safety & Technology Working Group (and my post about it)

    Categories

    Recent Posts

    • Safety by co-design: How we can take youth online safety to the next level
    • Much-less-social media on Facebook’s 20th birthday
    • What child online safety really needs, senators
    • Welcome to 2024!
    • Supporting the youngest witnesses of this humanitarian crisis
    • Should our kids learn how to use generative AI? Well…
    • The missing piece in US child online safety law
    • Generative AI: July 2023 freeze frame

    Footer

    Welcome to NetFamilyNews!

    Founded as a nonprofit public service in 1999, NetFamilyNews quickly became the “community newspaper” of a vital interest community of subscribers in more than 50 countries. Site and newsletter became a blog in the early 2000s. Nowadays, you can subscribe in the box to the right to receive articles in your in-box as they're posted – or look for toots on Mastodon or posts on our Facebook page, LinkedIn and Medium.com. She welcomes your comments, follows and shares!

    Categories

    • Home
    • Youth
    • Parenting
    • Literacy
    • Safety
    • Policy
    • Research

    ABOUT

    • About NFN
    • Supporters
    • Anne Collier’s Bio
    • Copyright
    • Privacy

    Search

    Subscribe



    THANKS TO NETFAMILYNEWS.ORG's SUPPORTER HOMESCHOOL CURRICULUM.
    Copyright © 2026 ANNE COLLIER. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.