• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

NetFamilyNews.org

Kid tech intel for everybody

Show Search
Hide Search
  • Home
  • Youth
  • Parenting
  • Literacy
  • Safety
  • Policy
  • Research
  • About NetFamilyNews.org
    • Supporters
    • Anne Collier’s Bio
    • Copyright
    • Privacy

Core concern: ‘Blue Whale’ & the social norms research

May 17, 2017 By Anne 19 Comments

June 11, 2017, adding an update in the form of author, journalist and game designer Andrea Angiolino’s response to sensationalist tabloid “coverage” in Italy of a new arrest in Russia – see the first sidebar below. My first post on the “Blue Whale challenge” was published March 13 here. Much has happened since then in a number of countries, so an update is in order, but I hope you agree that the most important part of this story is how and to what degree fake news becomes a real problem as it’s spread around the world…. 

How to spot fake news chart
By IFLA [CC BY 4.0], via Wikimedia Commons
It’s time for an update. Since I wrote about the “Blue Whale” story two months ago, the fake news has spread further (e.g., comments from multiple countries under my last post and these commentaries in Indonesia and Bosnia Herzegovina); the number of suicides linked to it has gone down drastically in that “coverage” (from 130 to “at least 16”) and we still don’t know if that number’s accurate; Philipp Budeikin, a Russian man alleged variously to have created it or organized groups of “players,” is reported to have pleaded guilty in St. Petersburg, Russia, to “charges of inciting at least 16 teenage girls to kill themselves by taking part in his ‘game'”; and now schools from Alabama, U.S., to Essex, U.K., are warning parents to be on the alert for signs that their kids are playing this so-called game.

There is no question that, if even one suicide is related to whatever is real in this story, it’s one too many. These developments add no clarity on that, though. “The arrest is real but it is absolutely unclear when it happened,” wrote Georgi Apostolov of Bulgaria’s Safer Internet Centre, which has thoroughly investigated this “story” with the aim of spreading digital media literacy – and thus the safety – of young Internet users in that country (he was responding to my request for his perspective on these latest developments). More on the safety part in a moment; first an update on what is known….

A media literate perspective

“Some sources claim that the arrest happened in November 2016, others in March 2017. There’s no official information about that. As Russian journalists say, it came after a series of sensational stories about Blue Whale by Galina Mursalieva [herself nicknamed “Klikuchka,” a play on “clickbait,” by other journalists, Apostolov wrote elsewhere] which put pressure on the authorities to take some action. Budeikin was investigated for months before the arrest, and he insisted he was not guilty. The investigation too could not find any evidence that he was guilty of inciting/pressing teens to suicide besides [finding only] that he was a member of Blue Whale groups in Russian social network site Vkontakte.” But he was found to be “psychologically disturbed,” Apostolov added. “When the story was picked up by many other Russian websites, he suddenly started to claim (according to not very reliable sources) that he was the ‘master’…. The first coverage in Russia was in the beginning of 2016, so for a long time the authorities did not arrest him or anybody else. In those publications different accounts of victims were mentioned – 150, 130, etc. Now they are 17. As you can see,” Apostolov wrote me, “the whole picture is quite chaotic but raises many serious doubts because of a number of inconsistencies.”

Impacts on youth

Blue Whale is such a quagmire that it’s hard even for those who’ve investigated it to tell where the disinformation stops and the misinformation, the unintentional falsity, starts. Spreading false information and fear is especially unfair to young people because they have little say in what misinformed adults decide for them upon hearing the information. And youth can be drawn to news of their peers, whether fake or factual, and so can inadvertently relate to, spread and be influenced by it – the exact opposite of what suicide prevention experts advise the news media to avoid.

Most important is the risk to vulnerable young people. None of this is to minimize in any way the harmful potential of false information spread globally, especially for young people lacking resilience, perspective and support.

“As many colleagues have said,” my European colleague Georgi Apostolov wrote, “it is fake but still can be dangerous for emotionally vulnerable children.” [Parents and educators may want to be alert to the possibility that kids – some very vulnerable ones crying out for and needing attention – will use the term “Blue Whale” to get that attention, whether or not the kids have had any brush with any Blue Whale group or with anyone who has.]

The central concern

So what, exactly, is the central concern? The fact that misperception (from widespread misinformation) affects behavior – in this particular case, potentially suicidal behavior. “Much if not most of the harm done by negative peer influences occurs through one’s misperception of the norm,” writes Wesley Perkins, one of the U.S.’s top researchers on social norms theory, which has a large and growing body of research. The Hobart and William Smith Colleges professor adds that “research has consistently shown peers to be one of the strongest influences on behavior, especially among youth.”

In another field, researchers at the University of Guelph in Ontario wrote in the Journal of Pediatric Psychology that “exposure to peer social norms that favored risk taking predicted a significant increase in risk taking.” So exaggerating youth risk-taking and spreading both the hype and fear about that misinformation (or disinformation) only increases the risk to young people who are relying on perception rather than facts. It directly impacts their behavior, in this case in a negative direction.

Young people deserve the truth about their peers for their own wellbeing – as I wrote in 2011 when news reporters were calling cyberbullying an “epidemic,” which was completely untrue. The more they hear the truth that the Blue Whale story is false and that the vast majority of their peers (what researchers call their “reference group”) are not manipulated by promoters of self-harm, the more likely it’ll be they’ll want to associate themselves with their peers’ media literacy. That is what needs to go viral.

June 7 Sidebar: ‘Do not call Blue Whale a game’

Game designer, author and journalist Andrea Angiolino has been documenting the spread of Blue Whale misinformation and fears through his country, Italy (his full bio is in English here).

Here’s what he wrote in previous articles about how the label itself becomes destructive clickbait: “Do not call Blue Whale ‘a game’…. The police themselves define it as ‘a practice that could possibly come from Russia and that is presented as ‘a challenge.’ In their report, and not by chance, the word ‘game’ never appears. Even if it did really exist as initially described, with persons deprived of their freedom and forced down a path of self-mutilation and suicide, it would not be a game, but rather an awful, criminal plagiarism. it has none of the distinctive qualities of a game. A game is something people join freely, by choice. Its outcome is unpredictable and separate from real life, with no consequences [maybe meaning no intentionally harmful ones]. By calling it a ‘game,’ you gift to it a fascination it does not deserve, arousing a curiosity that kids have (and should keep) for real and proper games….”

Angiolino’s interview with Georgi Apostolov, telling the whole story of “The Man Who Stopped the Blue Whale Hoax in Bulgaria,” was published this week in Italian gaming news site Gioconomico.net (this link is to the English-language version). Angiolino told me that he first offered the interview to Italy’s two largest-circulation news publications, and both turned it down.

June 11 update: In response to an absurdly short, clickbait-type article in Italian tabloid Il Giornale, Angiolino wrote about what actually happened:

Russian postman pretends to be a Blue Whale tutor to extort money”
The news of the latest ‘development’ in the ‘Blue Whale’ story – a new arrest in Moscow on June 8 – has now made it into the western European news media, bouncing through a British tabloid and the Facebook page of the Italian TV show Le Iene, whose suggestive report about the Blue Whale challenge has itself gotten a lot of media attention, due to Le Iene’s admission to showing completely unrelated suicide videos. Ilya Sidorow, a 26-year-old mail carrier, was arrested for joining a discussion group with the aim of extorting money from teenagers. According to Pravmir.ru, Sidorov extorted more than $400 from a 14-year-old girl he blackmailed by pretending to be a Blue Whale Challenge ‘kurator.’ He was arrested under a Russian law approved on June 7 that makes instigating suicide via the Internet punishable by up to 6 years in prison. However, the arrest was made before Sidorov had persuaded anybody to commit suicide, and the worldwide number of deaths linked to Blue Whale remains zero.”

SIDEBAR 1: Earlier update from Bulgaria’s Safer Internet Centre

Here’s a summary of the Bulgarian Safer Internet Centre’s perspective on the latest developments in the Blue Whale phenomenon, based on its investigative work in the interest of online safety through digital media literacy:

  • “Blue Whale groups existed in Vkontakte [Russia’s largest social network site] since the end of 2015-beginning of 2016. They were part of a specific teen subculture, and the members were playing with the suicide and death theme (this does not mean that such play could not be really dangerous for emotionally/psychologically unstable youth). Not one of several authors/initiators [referred to in the news] could be identified – so the story of [game] ‘master/s’ is fake. That means that the ‘game’ (there is no game as such – just communication within the groups) is fake as well.
  • “[Philipp] Budeikin was a member of several such groups and because of this he was easy prеy for the authorities when they felt pressure to do something.
  • “The only 2 official statements about the story have been: 1. Budeikin was arrested on suspicion of being somehow linked to the Blue Whale, authorities are still investigating and have not [so far] found any real evidence of his guilt (an investigator in St. Petersburg [Russia]). 2. No special investigation unit for the Blue Whale was formed, as reported by some of the same websites ([they cite the Russian] Ministry of Interior).
  • “The phrase ‘biological waste” [attributed to Budeikin in a BBC article and other news reports] appeared in a … Russian website [last November] claiming that they had interviewed Budeikin a few days before his arrest. There are several interesting things there: Budeikin said that he has bipolar disorder. Then he refutes the publications about 130 teens having taken their lives – they were just 17, he says [it’s not clear how he knew that]. The ‘biological waste’ phrase reappeared 12.12.2016 in the title of a story in another website based on an interview with a high ranking police officer. But it does not appear in the interview itself. The policeman is very cautious and repeats that they need more evidence to put Budeikin on trial. No other accomplices were identified, the policeman says.”

I hope that what emerges from this dark story is the understanding that, because of perception’s powerful influence on behavior, spreading false information can only increase the danger of what it’s describing. So challenge negative news about people, especially young people. They deserve the truth, and they deserve to be taught how to discern it. If nothing else is clear here, I hope it’s becoming clearer that media literacy is protective.

Related links

  • On the “contagion” risk: “Irresponsible reporting on suicide overwhelmingly impacts the young,” according to a study published in the journal Lancet Psychiatry in 2014. The same researcher, Dr. Madelyn Gould of the New York State Psychiatric Institute, found in an earlier study that “the prevalence of copycat suicide is up to four times higher in young adults than any other age group,” reported TheDailyBeast.com, referring to “social  learning theory” (a cousin of social norms theory?). Note that this is about irresponsible reporting; viral misinformation or disinformation is at least an order of magnitude worse, right? Here are guidelines for responsible reporting of suicide from the suicide prevention field.
  • On the importance of digital media literacy: “The Blue Whale game paradox, digital literacy and fake news” in the Parenting for a Digital Future blog at the London School of Economics
  • “Youth Health & Safety Project” – and Perkins’s paper “Misperception is Reality: The “Reign of Error” About Peer Risk Behaviour Norms Among Youth and Young Adults” in the Journal and dozens of other studies documenting how perception of peer norms affects behavior
  • “Only Kids Who Are Fools Would Do That!: Peer Social Norms Influence Children’s Risk-Taking Decisions” in the Journal of Pediatric Psychology
  • In the first Blue Whale coverage I’ve seen linking to help for vulnerable youth, Wired UK quoted London School of Economics psychology professor Sonia Livingstone as saying that “The importance of media literacy to identify and reject fake news is vital for everyone, but especially for parents whose anxieties about their children’s safety make them too easily to fall prey to clickbait designed to trap them. The responsibilities of journalists to check their facts and sources has also never been so great, as the Blue Whale scare illustrates clearly.”
  • “Navigating the News: New report details how youth express low trust in media, vary strategies to verify content” documents young people’s own fact-checking of information they encounter online. One of the report’s author’s, Amanda Lenhart, wrote the its findings “illustrate a variety of innovative strategies that young people are using to assess the veracity of the news stories they find online.” Amanda is senior research scientist at the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Here‘s the report itself.
  • My own post in 2011 about the social norms research as it relates to bullying and cyberbullying: “Kids deserve the truth about cyberbullying”
  • From Italy,  a just published article in ValigiaBlu.it, a collective blog about how journalism and the media are changing – what Georgi Apostolov in Bulgaria called “the most detailed investigative piece I’ve seen yet.”
  • In a thorough investigative article last February (right after Safer Internet Centre Bulgaria published its investigative work), Radio Free Europe reported that “child suicide is a real problem in these countries [Russia, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan]. According to the Russian government, 720 minors committed suicide in 2016. Authorities say the main causes are unrequited love, family problems, and mental-health issues. Lack of opportunity and widespread alcoholism and drug abuse are cited as contributing factors. Only 0.6 percent have any connection to the Internet or social media.”
  • A couple of months later (April ’17) Bloomberg, the U.S. news organization, published a post that includes suicide rates (of 15-19 YOs) in multiple countries, showing how Russia’s compares with other countries’ (more than 2.5 times that of the U.S. and more than 4 times that of Brazil), based on OECD figures. While the article’s background “facts” don’t quite sync with more recent investigative work and it makes unhelpful generalizations about today’s teens, it tells a story that suggests how healthy teens deal with would-be online manipulators and offers a few insights into the society in which the “death groups” story emerged.
Share Button

Filed Under: Literacy & Citizenship, Risk & Safety, social norms Tagged With: "Blue Whale", Budeikin, Georgi Apostolov, Safer Internet Centre, social norms research, social norms theory, Vkontakte

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. madhusmita says

    September 11, 2017 at 7:04 am

    Yes @dinesh thanks for your information

    Reply
  2. madhusmita says

    September 11, 2017 at 7:02 am

    Thanks
    For kind explanations both Anne and Andrew killeen.

    Reply
  3. Dinesh says

    September 1, 2017 at 12:09 pm

    @Madhusmita this challange is real and today in zee news DNA there was one more news about it and this time an adult has committed suicide after playing blue whale game.

    Reply
    • Anne says

      September 2, 2017 at 10:56 am

      Dinesh, I’m curious, were you the Dinesh who wrote the post in MindBloggers? If you’re interested in some background to all this (Russia has one of the highest teen suicide rates, according to the OECD), see the quite remarkable investigative work of Meduza in these two articles (which I read in English with the help of Google Translate): March 2017: https://meduza.io/feature/2017/03/03/kto-takoy-filipp-lis-i-kakoe-otnoshenie-on-imeet-k-sinim-kitam-iz-vkontakte-reportazh-meduzy linking to earlier reporting in Feb. 2017: https://meduza.io/feature/2017/02/17/gorodskaya-legenda-chto-stoit-za-igroy-siniy-kit-i-vspleskom-interesa-k-suitsidalnym-pablikam

      My guess is, Latvia-based Meduza is at least as reliable an information source as any Russia-based one. According to Wikipedia, it’s “run by a team of around 20 journalists who resigned from their jobs at Lenta.ru following [Meduza founder] Galina Timchenko’s unexpected removal from her post by the website’s owner and Vladimir Putin ally, the oligarch Alexander Mamut.”

      Reply
  4. Dinesh says

    September 1, 2017 at 12:07 pm

    Author has enlightened me and parents also should take it into notice and not to be ignorant in this situation.

    Reply
  5. Madhusmita says

    August 27, 2017 at 2:19 am

    Is this challenge is true or someone spreading this fake challenge?

    Reply
    • Anne says

      August 29, 2017 at 10:52 am

      As you may’ve read in my first post on “Blue Whale” last March, it has been called “clickbait” or “a wave of clickbait” and “fake news” by Internet safety and media literacy professionals in eastern Europe close to its origins in Russia and Kyrgyzstan. So I’ve relied heavily on their expertise – and the early investigative work of RFE/RL – to share how this much-hyped misinformation has spread. It’s hard for people in India, the US or any other country to tell fact from fiction in info that comes from other countries, when we don’t fully understand the cultures, laws, media and government-news media relationships in those other countries.

      The more “fake news” or even partially true stories spread, the more people are exposed to them, including vulnerable people, which is why we don’t want to see people believing and spreading them. But we know from the research that suicide very, very rarely has a single cause, and even more rarely stems from an event or information beyond the direct experience of the individual. We need to be just as alert to signs of depression, extreme anxiety, bullying (social cruelty) in the life of a child as to any story about what might be happening online.

      So regarding the “Blue Whale” story, the core question for parents and other caregivers is – if a child is particularly vulnerable – whether there’s manipulation going on in that child’s online experience. It’s not a “game” or a story about a game itself that’s the issue; online manipulation, and vulnerability to it, is the issue. We can ask our kids if they’re communicating or “playing” with anyone they don’t know online. Most kids find the very idea of that creepy and know to ignore or block such communication (there’s research on that). So if the child is particularly uncommunicative and shows signs of mental health challenges, sleep deprivation, not wanting to go to school, depression, etc., that’s when we need to be concerned about something like a “Blue Whale game.” In particular, “look for uncharacteristic behavior changes,” suicide prevention expert Dan Reidenberg wrote me, for example, “drawings or comments about blue whales, withdrawal from their typical peer group, spending more time than usual online and not allowing you to know what they are doing, or engaging in more reckless behaviors.”

      Hopefully, we’re aware of our children’s struggles, interests and needs and are working with them well before they’d want to look for approval and attention in other ways, including online. Does that make sense? Come back at me if not – or if you want a quick summary of what we know about “Blue Whale” so far, but I’ve written plenty about it in three blog posts and replies to comments.

      Oh, and watch out for manipulative “Blue Whale” apps designed to install malware on your phone. That’s another outcome of stories that go viral, especially globally. Thanks for asking!

      Reply
  6. Andrew Killeen says

    May 19, 2017 at 1:35 am

    You might be interested in an article I wrote on this subject, after reports of the “game” being played in China. I’ve used and acknowledged your excellent work, but also done some extra digging which might be of interest to you and your readers:

    http://www.beijing-kids.com/blog/2017/05/19/blue-whale-suicide-game-arrived-china/

    Reply
    • Anne says

      May 19, 2017 at 10:34 am

      Thank you for your thoughtful reporting, Andrew.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Momo. Again. - NetFamilyNews.org says:
    November 16, 2021 at 4:28 am

    […] country was affected early on and they wanted to stop the harm in their country. In the case of Blue Whale a few years ago, with its origins in Russia, the most informed source I could find was the head of […]

    Reply
  2. 'Blue Whale': Clickbait or a new form of online grooming? - NetFamilyNews.org says:
    December 3, 2020 at 10:03 am

    […] my second post on the subject, I pointed to a core concern of information gone viral. The more “fake news” or […]

    Reply
  3. When 'fake news' becomes real: What next with 'Blue Whale'? - NetFamilyNews.org says:
    December 3, 2020 at 9:46 am

    […] the reporter says or what their sources say about the role of the “game” (it’s not a game) – usually the coverage of a tragic event like this comes well before an investigation is […]

    Reply
  4. July 2017 – Associates in Christian Counseling says:
    February 6, 2020 at 11:48 am

    […] about Blue Whale are exaggerated and essentially click-bait. (To read more about this, visit https://www.netfamilynews.org/blue-whale-2-months-later-real-concern) While that’s certainly good news, even one person seeking out such a harmful game is one too […]

    Reply
  5. What is the BlueWhale Game about? How Game the works | Dangerous! says:
    June 25, 2019 at 12:41 am

    […] maybe your One Share can Save 1ns Life. External Links for the Blue Whale-Pink Whale Challenge, Core concern: ‘Blue Whale’ & the social norms research, Blue Whale: il macabro gioco arrivato anche in Italia, Wiki for […]

    Reply
  6. When ‘fake news’ becomes real: the dangers online | Impero Software (US) says:
    July 28, 2017 at 5:49 am

    […] what the reporter says or what their sources say about the role of the “game” (which it’s not) – usually the coverage of a tragic event like this comes well before an investigation is […]

    Reply
  7. Whether or not Blue Whale suicides exist, the fake news about them is dangerous - NewsAddUp says:
    July 13, 2017 at 6:15 am

    […] agree with Anne Collier’s observation that “misperception (from widespread misinformation) affects behavior – in this […]

    Reply
  8. Chi ha fermato la bufala del Blu Whale in Bulgaria? | Benvenuti nel sito ufficiale dell'Ass.ne Vittime di Violenza "Io No" says:
    June 12, 2017 at 1:31 am

    […] Internet Programme della Commissione Europea. Le sue dichiarazioni, riportate da Anne Collier su vari post, sono stati fondamentali per controbattere alla bufala in Italia come all’estero. Qua […]

    Reply
  9. Što se krije iza zastrašujuće priče o Plavom kitu? - Medijska pismenost says:
    May 24, 2017 at 1:26 am

    […] prenosili niz neprovjerenih informacija, iz nepouzdanih izvora, a prema riječima Anne Collier iz njezinog drugog članka o ovoj temi, “širenje lažnih informacija i straha osobito je štetno za mlade ljude koji nemaju puno […]

    Reply
  10. Diigo Links (weekly) | Mr. Gonzalez's Classroom says:
    May 21, 2017 at 8:02 am

    […] ‘Blue Whale’ 2 months later: The real concern – NetFamilyNews.org | NetFamilyNews.… […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

NFN in your in-box:

Anne Collier


Bio and my...
2016 TEDx Talk on
the heart of digital citizenship

Connect with me on LinkedIn
Follow me on MASTODON
Friend me on Facebook
See me on YouTube

IMPORTANT RESOURCES

Our (DIGITAL) PARENTING BASICS: Safety + Social
NAMLE, the National Association for Media Literacy Education
CASEL.org & the 5 core social-emotional competencies of SEL
Center for Democracy & Technology
Center for Innovative Public Health Research
Childnet International
Committee for Children
Congressional Internet Caucus Academy
ConnectSafely.org
Control Shift: a pivotal book for Internet safety
Crimes Against Children Research Center
Crisis Textline
Cyber Civil Rights Initiative's Revenge Porn Crisis Line
Cyberwise.org
danah boyd's blog and book about networked youth
Disconnected, Carrie James's book on digital ethics
FOSI.org's Good Digital Parenting
The research of Global Kids Online
The Good Project at Harvard's School of Education
If you watch nothing else: "Parenting in a Digital Age" TED Talk by Prof. Sonia Livingstone
The International Bullying Prevention Association
Let Grow Foundation
Making Caring Common
Raising Digital Natives, author Devorah Heitner's site
Renee Hobbs at the Media Education Lab
MediaSmarts.ca
The New Media Literacies
Report of the Aspen Task Force on Learning & the Internet and our guide to Creating Trusted Learning Environments
The Ruler Approach to social-emotional learning (Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence)
Sources of Strength
"Young & Online: Perspectives on life in a digital age" from young people in 26 countries (via UNICEF)
"Youth Safety on a Living Internet": 2010 report of the Online Safety & Technology Working Group (and my post about it)

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Safety by co-design: How we can take youth online safety to the next level
  • Much-less-social media on Facebook’s 20th birthday
  • What child online safety really needs, senators
  • Welcome to 2024!
  • Supporting the youngest witnesses of this humanitarian crisis
  • Should our kids learn how to use generative AI? Well…
  • The missing piece in US child online safety law
  • Generative AI: July 2023 freeze frame

Footer

Welcome to NetFamilyNews!

Founded as a nonprofit public service in 1999, NetFamilyNews quickly became the “community newspaper” of a vital interest community of subscribers in more than 50 countries. Site and newsletter became a blog in the early 2000s. Nowadays, you can subscribe in the box to the right to receive articles in your in-box as they're posted – or look for toots on Mastodon or posts on our Facebook page, LinkedIn and Medium.com. She welcomes your comments, follows and shares!

Categories

  • Home
  • Youth
  • Parenting
  • Literacy
  • Safety
  • Policy
  • Research

ABOUT

  • About NFN
  • Supporters
  • Anne Collier’s Bio
  • Copyright
  • Privacy

Search

Subscribe



THANKS TO NETFAMILYNEWS.ORG's SUPPORTER HOMESCHOOL CURRICULUM.
Copyright © 2025 ANNE COLLIER. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.