• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

NetFamilyNews.org

Kid tech intel for everybody

Show Search
Hide Search
  • Home
  • Youth
  • Parenting
  • Literacy
  • Safety
  • Policy
  • Research
  • About NetFamilyNews.org
    • Supporters
    • Anne Collier’s Bio
    • Copyright
    • Privacy

Formspring: What’s going on around it

May 11, 2010 By Anne 11 Comments

Last week I wrote about what’s going on at Formspring. This week: what’s going on around it. The problem we, all of us, are dealing with isn’t mainly a Web site whose business plan did not include teens using the site for their own purposes, some harmful. I think everyone can agree that the basic problem is the nasty behavior on it. What those of us who grew up in the mass-media era struggle over is what today’s (social) media companies and Web sites can do about that behavior buried in millions of accounts or pages.

“Living, breathing” products. What’s difficult for those of us used to a regulated, professionally produced mass-media environment to understand is why it could be hard for social media companies to fix their “product.” Of course there are things they can and should do to help – such as responsiveness to abuse reports – but there’s nothing they can do to fix the problems in their services completely. Why? Because…

  1. They don’t produce their “products” – their users do. And not only do users produce most of the product, they’re constantly changing it.
  2. The products of the social Web not only increasingly mirror the full spectrum of human life, they’re an expression of it – I mean, life, sociality, and behavior are being expressed in (or as) these products in realtime.
  3. The problems in this “living” product are largely rooted in real-life relationships, not just the behavior in the Web sites where it lives.
  4. New “product,” good and bad, is unfolding continuously. What sites can do – account deletions, for example – are temporary measures, not solutions. New profiles and groups can replace deleted ones pretty much instantly (and do, when there’s bullying going on or a long-term disagreement).

A new social contract. This new, user-driven media environment we’re all experiencing (even non-users, whose loved ones take and post photos of them on a social network site) is, in effect, a new kind of social contract – a tenuous, evolving, unwritten “contract” to which providers, users, and government are all “signatories”; power, or control, is distributed; and the contract’s already in place. We all, providers included, signed on the minute we started participating. Under it, no single signatory – users, companies, or government – has total control over the product (users who have self-control still have to negotiate outcomes with fellow users who can comment on their content, tag them in photos, etc.), and all have responsibilities as well as rights. It’s the social Web’s “social contract” that, because its conditions are constantly changing, is under continuous negotiation.

But let’s look at some of the “fixes” being proposed for the Formspring problem:

  • Not allowing users under 18. Formspring could make the investment in adding credit card validation, as adult-content sites do, but should this be required of all sites used by teens, barring all teens when not all have abused their services – in fact, probably only a minority of them? It would have to be required by some sort of regulation because few sites would so significantly reduce their traffic, their source of revenue, without being required to do so. But that regulation – even if it passed constitutional muster – would affect only US-based sites, marginally solving only part of the problem.
  • Employing moderators and tech protections to stop abusive behavior. Children’s sites do this because children must be protected, as should all minors be, but I wonder if sites for everybody 13+ could afford such protections scaled to tens, in some cases hundreds, of millions of users and stay in business. Probably not, but such an analysis has not been made public. Probably many would be forced out of business, which is fine, theoretically, but people have gotten accustomed to using social network sites. They’re a fact of life now, and there would probably be an even greater clamor to keep them in business than develops against less conscientious sites when they hit the news. The dilemma even great kids’ sites have is that the more restrictions you place on user activity, the more likely users are to migrate elsewhere. So, for survival, kids’ sites have to strike a delicate balance: “protecting their brand” and getting as close as possible to 100% safe, while not restricting kids’ activity so much that they go to the nearest competitor (there are hundreds of kids’ virtual worlds – see this on virtual world moderators and these safety tips).
  • Beefing up abuse reporting and customer service. Something we want from all sites, but there are the regulatory and business issues above, and then there’s the Formspring example. Some of the nasty behavior on it is peer group-imposed or self-imposed harassment – like the peer-pressure-loaded show of bravado in a “Truth or Dare” game. Participants would not be reporting abuse that they don’t see (or won’t admit to seeing) as abuse. Adults who go on the site and find abusive behavior could use the abuse-reporting process, but what would it accomplish beyond getting accounts shut down and, again, sending kids into more “underground” settings for this interaction, where there’s even less prospect of detection or supervision?
  • Pressuring Formspring out of business to set an example. Teens are always looking for spaces online and offline away from adult monitoring, so the more we might try to ban or shut down Web sites, the fewer legitimate sites there would be for teens and the more “underground” they go. New ones pop up all the time, usually without the safety features that more established sites have. “Underground” is a big space online.

We don’t need to add “migratory cyberbullying” to the youth-online-risk list by focusing too much on “bad sites” rather than bad behavior. The profound media shift we’re experiencing is requiring a huge adjustment for anyone not born into the Web 2.0 era and is extremely frustrating to anyone seeking recourse through litigation or regulation (both becoming slow, inflexible blunt instruments in this fast-moving, user-driven environment). Social media companies that don’t really own the content and can’t keep it from leaving don’t have as much control over the product as we might think. And, though users have more power than they did in the mass-media era (or ever in history), they have little control over fellow users. Increasingly, it’s all a negotiation – or better, a collaboration.

Challenge me on any of this. This is starkly painted, and of course nothing’s black and white. But I’ve been watching this new social contract evolve for 15 years, and it’s clearer and clearer to me that the only real solution is an immediate and long-term national (or global) commitment to teach and model the rights and responsibilities of good citizens online as well as offline (because it’s all just life to young people) and a new media literacy that addresses what’s said, done, and shared in media as well as what’s consumed. It’s far from a quick fix but – once we get going – it will start delivering right away. Because the research shows that responsible behavior is protective.

Related links

  • How social networks can be protective
  • How to make digital citizenship relevant
  • “PBS Frontline’s ‘Digital Nation’: Presenting our generation with a crucial choice”
  • Why new media literacy is protective
  • “Online Safety 3.0: Empower and Protecting Youth
Share Button

Filed Under: cyberbullying, Literacy & Citizenship, media shift, Risk & Safety, Social Media Tagged With: Formspring, media shift, social contract, Social Media

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Patricia says

    August 11, 2012 at 4:58 pm

    Thanks for another great post. Where else may just anybody
    get that kind of information in such a perfect means of writing?

    I’ve a presentation subsequent week, and I am at the search for such info.

    Reply
  2. Nancy Willard says

    May 11, 2010 at 5:07 pm

    Very well said Anne. Also very similar to what Naisbitt said in his book Megatrends, published in 1980.

    “When we fall into the trap of believing or, more accurately, hoping that technology will solve all of our problems, we are actually abdicating the high touch of personal responsibility. *** In our minds at least, technology is always on the verge of liberating us from personal discipline and responsibility. Only it never does and never will. The more technology around us, the more the need for human touch.”

    Best, Nancy

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Social cruelty on Ask.fm & the whack-a-mole tendency - NetFamilyNews.org | NetFamilyNews.org says:
    March 3, 2014 at 6:14 pm

    […] And now we see this story in, for example, The Independent in Dublin: “Last fall, a girl told us she had put a question about herself on the ask.fm site and was waiting for the anonymous answers. She said while they might be mean, at least she would know what people think about her.” This is exactly what teens were doing in Formspring (I wrote two posts about it three years ago in “Formspring: What’s really going on” and “Formspring: What’s going on around it”). […]

    Reply
  2. Shaping Youth » Rachel Simmons Chats About Mythbusting “Mean Girl” Media says:
    August 31, 2011 at 9:56 pm

    […] Formspring: What’s Going On Around It (NetFamilyNews) […]

    Reply
  3. Shaping Youth » Recap of White House Conf on Bullying Prevention, Pt.1 says:
    March 19, 2011 at 8:54 pm

    […] take-downs, analysts and educators have continuously scrambled to track the trends and determine “What’s REALLY going on” in and around the Formspring site behaviorally and […]

    Reply
  4. A window onto family Facebook use: TRUSTe study | NetFamilyNews.org says:
    October 18, 2010 at 5:42 pm

    […] about focusing solely on parents' concerns with an eye toward legislation at a time when – as I wrote earlier – legislation is becoming a slow, inflexible blunt instrument in a continuously changing […]

    Reply
  5. 2 new kids’ social spaces: ToonsTunes, Scuttlepad | NetFamilyNews.org says:
    August 12, 2010 at 11:34 pm

    […] A little context on the social Web […]

    Reply
  6. Phoebe Prince story: Much more than meets the eye | NetFamilyNews.org says:
    July 22, 2010 at 5:09 pm

    […] view,” “Click, cliques & cyberbullying: Whole school response is key,” “Formspring: What’s going on around it,” and “Citizenship & the social Web mirror in our faces 24/7“ // Share| […]

    Reply
  7. A teen on kid virtual worlds: Insights | NetFamilyNews.org says:
    July 2, 2010 at 12:33 am

    […] from a menu of pre-written phrases, as in TinyPlanets.com, but this comment confirms what I wrote here, under “Employing moderators and tech protections.” “For example,” […]

    Reply
  8. The ‘Era of Behavior’ online too, of course | NetFamilyNews.org says:
    May 28, 2010 at 3:50 pm

    […] be turning mere users into stakeholders and citizens. [See also this about "the guild effect" and "Formspring: What's going on around it."] // Share| Permalink Post a comment — Trackback URI RSS 2.0 feed for these comments […]

    Reply
  9. Formspring: What’s really going on? | NetFamilyNews.org says:
    May 11, 2010 at 3:41 pm

    […] Next: “Formspring: What’s going on around it“ […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

NFN in your in-box:

Anne Collier


Bio and my...
2016 TEDx Talk on
the heart of digital citizenship

Subscribe to my
RSS feed
Follow me on Twitter or even better:
NEW: Follow me on MASTODON!
Friend me on Facebook
See me on YouTube

IMPORTANT RESOURCES

Our (DIGITAL) PARENTING BASICS: Safety + Social
NAMLE, the National Association for Media Literacy Education
CASEL.org & the 5 core social-emotional competencies of SEL
Center for Democracy & Technology
Center for Innovative Public Health Research
Childnet International
Committee for Children
Congressional Internet Caucus Academy
ConnectSafely.org
Control Shift: a pivotal book for Internet safety
Crimes Against Children Research Center
Crisis Textline
Cyber Civil Rights Initiative's Revenge Porn Crisis Line
Cyberwise.org
danah boyd's blog and book about networked youth
Disconnected, Carrie James's book on digital ethics
FOSI.org's Good Digital Parenting
The research of Global Kids Online
The Good Project at Harvard's School of Education
If you watch nothing else: "Parenting in a Digital Age" TED Talk by Prof. Sonia Livingstone
The International Bullying Prevention Association
Let Grow Foundation
Making Caring Common
Raising Digital Natives, author Devorah Heitner's site
Renee Hobbs at the Media Education Lab
MediaSmarts.ca
The New Media Literacies
Report of the Aspen Task Force on Learning & the Internet and our guide to Creating Trusted Learning Environments
The Ruler Approach to social-emotional learning (Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence)
Sources of Strength
"Young & Online: Perspectives on life in a digital age" from young people in 26 countries (via UNICEF)
"Youth Safety on a Living Internet": 2010 report of the Online Safety & Technology Working Group (and my post about it)

Categories

Recent Posts

  • A solution for ‘awful but lawful’
  • New global service for getting nudes off the Internet
  • Then there’s the flip side of ChatGPT
  • For SID 2023: What youth want ‘online safety’ to teach
  • ChatGPT for media literacy training
  • Future safety: Content moderators and digital grassroots justice
  • Mental health 2023, Part 1: Youth on algorithms
  • Where did my Twitter go? And other end-of-2022 notes

Footer

Welcome to NetFamilyNews!

Founded as a nonprofit public service in 1999, NetFamilyNews quickly became the “community newspaper” of a vital interest community of subscribers in more than 50 countries. Site and newsletter became a blog in the early 2000s. Nowadays, you can subscribe in the box to the right to receive articles in your in-box as they're posted – or look for tweets, posts on our Facebook page, and key commentaries from Anne on her page at Medium.com. She welcomes your comments, follows and shares!

Categories

  • Home
  • Youth
  • Parenting
  • Literacy
  • Safety
  • Policy
  • Research

ABOUT

  • About NFN
  • Supporters
  • Anne Collier’s Bio
  • Copyright
  • Privacy

Search

Subscribe



THANKS TO NETFAMILYNEWS.ORG's SUPPORTER HOMESCHOOL CURRICULUM.
Copyright © 2023 ANNE COLLIER. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.