Is it appropriate for teachers and administrators to discipline students because of their blog posts? Even students who disagree with some threatening posts about teachers by three peers at Taft High School told the Chicago Sun-Times that it was the students’ right to make those remarks. The three are 7th- and 8th-grade students in the Advanced Placement program at Taft. One wrote this about a teacher in a Xanga blog Nov. 3: “She’ll see oh yes, there will be blood” and “no, I won’t kill her … yet,” according to the Sun-Times. “Chicago Public Schools lawyers Wednesday approved disciplinary action against the students after a long review over whether outraged Taft administration officials were wading into First Amendment waters by seeking suspensions.” The three were suspended, the Sun-Times added, “one for as long as 10 days.” Another Chicago public school handling a student-blogging case last year did not suspend a student for discriminatory remarks, but a spokesman said this recent case was different because posts referred to specific individuals and physically threatening. The incident “has divided students and teachers” at Taft, according to the Sun-Times says, and debate over student First Amendment rights continues nationwide. The article comes with a sidebar reporting that, especially since the Columbine High School shootings in 1999, “the majority of courts [dealing with these cases] around the country … have held that school officials are well within their rights to discipline students for what they post off-campus on the Internet.” For more legal info, see the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s guide to student blogging.
Meanwhile, the Middletown (Ohio) Journal published an editorial today about two cases of Ohio students posting death threats in their Xanga blogs. See also “School nixes blogging” and “Student wins free-speech case.” Email me *your* experiences with student blogs anytime (or post just below)!
Leave a Reply