• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

NetFamilyNews.org

Kid tech intel for everybody

Show Search
Hide Search
  • Home
  • Youth
  • Parenting
  • Literacy
  • Safety
  • Policy
  • Research
  • About NetFamilyNews.org
    • Supporters
    • Anne Collier’s Bio
    • Copyright
    • Privacy

The ‘minimum age’ & other unintended consequences of COPPA

August 8, 2012 By Anne 3 Comments

It’s tough to be the FTC – or anyone else trying to make rules for user-driven (social) media. It’s hard enough to make static rules address fast-changing technology. Then there’s the problem of changing understanding of consumers – the intended beneficiaries of the rules and the users of user-driven media – as we all adjust to having the data that represents so much of our everyday lives in a giant, amorphous, seemingly uncontrollable “place” called “the cloud.” But hardest of all is writing rules that govern a mash-up of business practices and human behavior updated in real time. How to regulate the business part of the equation without regulating the consumer-behavior part and without unintended consequences?

The answer everybody has found is that it can’t be done. Many unintended consequences of COPPA are already well-established. One of them is what has, in effect, amazingly become the minimum age of social networking worldwide, including for many sites not based in the US: 13, an age the FTC was associating with the collection and disclosure of kids’ personal information not their social development. That created other unintended consequences, including millions of kids lying about their age in order to set up accounts in social sites (see this), the undermining of parents’ ability to decide the appropriate age for their own kids to start using social media, and a great proportion of US parents helping their “underage” children sign up (a link to the study here).

And there are non-family-related unintended consequences of the law, in its latest proposed iteration, my ConnectSafely co-director Larry Magid wrote, such as discouraging “companies from offering services to people under 13 or even allowing pre-teens to use services that could benefit them” and making it harder for small or young companies serving children to enter the market. Those consequences can put a chill on innovation and limit options for kids.

FTC’s apparent restraint

The FTC certainly can’t undo all those unintended consequences, so it seems to have decided to minimize the creation of a lot more by sticking to closing loopholes in the 2000 rule that predated social media and catching it up with the technology. “To keep up with modern times, the FTC wants to revise COPPA rules so that they apply to third-party advertising networks along with app and plug-in developers and to expand the definition of ‘personal information’,” Larry wrote. That definition now addresses the use of “cookies” that track people from site to site – as the FTC put its, “persistent identifiers and screen or user names other than where they are used to support internal operations, and website or online service directed to children to include additional indicia that a site or service may be targeted to children.”

The revisions, “which the commission intends to complete by the end of the year, are the result of a review begun in 2010,” the New York Times reports. The FTC welcomes public comments on them, and public comments are just that – they don’t have to be formal or scholarly. They can be submitted until Sept. 10 (here’s the FTC’s form).

Self-regulation (personal, corporate) essential too

My own comment here is that our current global media environment calls for healthy skepticism toward rules and regulations at every level, from school to national to international – and not only because of the unintended consequences they can create. Just by the nature of social media, regulation can’t protect us the way it could in earlier media eras. That’s because, in a user-driven media environment, users have so much impact on their own and each other’s privacy, as well as that of the environment (the same for safety, of course).

Privacy and safety are a distributed and shared responsibility – of users (of all ages) toward themselves and each other, together with service providers, parents, schools, law enforcement, and authorities. They simply can’t be entirely ensured by laws or regulations. Laws can only help – if they’re written with an understanding of this new media reality, and that’s a big “if.” It looks to me like the FTC has shown some intelligent restraint.

Related links

  • “Juvenile cyber-delinquency: Laws that are turning kids into criminals” in TechRepublic.com
  • “What Do Kids Know about Online Privacy? More Than You Think”: KQED’s Mind/Shift on research from the Harvard School of Education published last March in the journal Learning, Media & Technology
  • How what I call “anti-social media companies” create their own obsolescence and why pro-social is simply good business (posted last December)
  • About “citizen regulators” in “SOPA & citizenship in a digital age” (January 2012)
  • “Social Web privacy: A new kind of social contract we’re all signed onto” (April 2010) and, the following month, some context for the Formspring story that went national then
  • “Youth privacy study: Should focus be only on parents’ views?” (October 2010)
  • “A new book & fresh look at online privacy” (July 2011)
  • About the youth-safety implications of what our task force report called a “living Internet” (June 2010)
Share Button

Filed Under: Law & Policy, Literacy & Citizenship, Privacy, Research Tagged With: COPPA, FTC, laws, legislation, online safety, Privacy, regulation, under 13, unintended consequences

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. Finally!: Solid cyberbullying data on tweens - NetFamilyNews.org says:
    October 15, 2020 at 9:06 pm

    […] of COPPA, the Children’s Online Protection Act, which in effect (not technically) created a “minimum age” for youth “social networking.” So research, not very helpfully, has focused largely on young […]

    Reply
  2. COPPA has likely increased minors' risk: Study | NetFamilyNews.org says:
    November 29, 2012 at 11:46 pm

    […] “The ‘minimum age’ & other unintended consequences of COPPA” Permalink Post a comment — Trackback URI RSS 2.0 feed for these comments This entry (permalink) was posted on Thursday, November 29, 2012, at 11:24 pm by Anne. Filed in children's privacy, COPPA, online safety research, Privacy, Research, Risk & Safety, Social Media, social networking research, Youth-Risk Research and tagged children's privacy, COPPA, Facebook, New York University, online privacy, Social Media, Social Networking. […]

    Reply
  3. Today's Net, kids & COPPA: Our comment to the FTC | NetFamilyNews.org says:
    September 25, 2012 at 3:14 pm

    […] My post last August about “The minimum age & other unintended consequences of COPPA” […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

NFN in your in-box:

Anne Collier


Bio and my...
2016 TEDx Talk on
the heart of digital citizenship

Subscribe to my
RSS feed
Friend me on
Facebook
Follow me on
Twitter
See me on
YouTube

IMPORTANT RESOURCES

Our (DIGITAL) PARENTING BASICS: Safety + Social
NAMLE, the National Association for Media Literacy Education
CASEL.org & the 5 core social-emotional competencies of SEL
Center for Democracy & Technology
Center for Innovative Public Health Research
Childnet International
Committee for Children
Congressional Internet Caucus Academy
ConnectSafely.org
Control Shift: a pivotal book for Internet safety
Crimes Against Children Research Center
Crisis Textline
Cyber Civil Rights Initiative's Revenge Porn Crisis Line
Cyberwise.org
danah boyd's blog and book about networked youth
Disconnected, Carrie James's book on digital ethics
FOSI.org's Good Digital Parenting
The research of Global Kids Online
The Good Project at Harvard's School of Education
If you watch nothing else: "Parenting in a Digital Age" TED Talk by Prof. Sonia Livingstone
The International Bullying Prevention Association
Let Grow Foundation
Making Caring Common
Raising Digital Natives, author Devorah Heitner's site
Renee Hobbs at the Media Education Lab
MediaSmarts.ca
The New Media Literacies
Report of the Aspen Task Force on Learning & the Internet and our guide to Creating Trusted Learning Environments
The Ruler Approach to social-emotional learning (Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence)
Sources of Strength
"Young & Online: Perspectives on life in a digital age" from young people in 26 countries (via UNICEF)
"Youth Safety on a Living Internet": 2010 report of the Online Safety & Technology Working Group (and my post about it)

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Children’s own views on well-being: Global study
  • Most kids are fine online: New study
  • Datafied Childhoods the book
  • Powerful parenting for child safety online, offline
  • Media literacy and an invasion: The view from Estonia
  • Online safety for 2022: 8 things we need to see
  • ‘Playful by Design,’ a landmark report
  • 9 things that make viral hoaxes challenging

Footer

Welcome to NetFamilyNews!

Founded as a nonprofit public service in 1999, NetFamilyNews quickly became the “community newspaper” of a vital interest community of subscribers in more than 50 countries. Site and newsletter became a blog in the early 2000s. Nowadays, you can subscribe in the box to the right to receive articles in your in-box as they're posted – or look for tweets, posts on our Facebook page, and key commentaries from Anne on her page at Medium.com. She welcomes your comments, follows and shares!

Categories

  • Home
  • Youth
  • Parenting
  • Literacy
  • Safety
  • Policy
  • Research

ABOUT

  • About NFN
  • Supporters
  • Anne Collier’s Bio
  • Copyright
  • Privacy

Search

Subscribe



THANKS TO NETFAMILYNEWS.ORG's SUPPORTER HOMESCHOOL CURRICULUM.
Copyright © 2022 ANNE COLLIER. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.