• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

NetFamilyNews.org

Kid tech intel for everybody

Show Search
Hide Search
  • Home
  • Youth
  • Parenting
  • Literacy
  • Safety
  • Policy
  • Research
  • About NetFamilyNews.org
    • Supporters
    • Anne Collier’s Bio
    • Copyright
    • Privacy

Handling toxicity: Insights for parents & teachers from Riot Games

June 13, 2016 By Anne 3 Comments

There’s real wisdom for parents, coaches and educators – not to mention gamers, athletes and social media users – in this business story about what toxic behavior does to a team. The game in question? League of Legends, a 30 million-player “team-based game” along the lines of Capture the Flag “or, more aptly, ‘destroy the enemy base’,” according to Google’s re:Work’s description. The game company itself, Riot Games, ranks high on Fortune’s 100 Best Places to Work For list, re:Work says.

riotgamesWhen you read this, think game play if you’re a gamer (or coach) or school climate if you’re an educator: Riot figured out that, “if a new player encounters toxic behavior in their very first game, they are 320% less likely to come back again.” That’s not a typo, but even if it were 32%, that’s a lot of people who don’t want to go back to the game, as it would be of students not wanting to go back to school. [Important: This is toxic behavior as defined by the community, not its creators or managers.] “Research has shown that having a toxic teammate in the workplace can bring down the performance and morale of an entire team,” re:Work cited Harvard Business School research as finding. All of Riot’s employees play League of Legends and have an in-game profile, which is a little Big Brother-ish sounding, right? But keep reading.

Here’s the part that I think parents and educators will find useful: what the company found out about the toxic in-game behavior and how it handled the people who engaged in it. Four things:

  1. Mostly snark. This is true in social media too, I suspect (part of the “drama” teens refer to and get tired of): “The most common bad behaviors … were passive aggression (snarky comments) and the use of authoritative language [possible adolescent versions being snark suggestive that “I have more follows than you” or the like] to intimidate or threaten others.” Do you, like I, find it interesting that there’s little difference between school and work spaces, here? This is not just “kid stuff.” Note that it’s not the extreme – cyberbullying (repeated, intentional victimization) – that’s most common.
  2. Situation fluid. Like moods, the snark and toxicity ebb and flow. When viewers zoom in on the snark from outside the game and the social context, they might be tempted to think this is the way the behaviors or the behavers always are. That’s just not the case. The lesson being that it helps no one – the viewer or the player – to lock the behavior in cement or identify the behaver with a behavior taken out of context. We can’t tell much about a film from a freeze frame of it, right? And yet social media is even more complex, contextual and, well, social than any film!
  3. Communication ensued. Riot didn’t write anybody off. The company identified “the 30 most toxic employees (all of whom were more junior Rioters, new to the working world)” and talked with each one – armed with game chat logs. “While these logs did factor into the exits of a couple employees who had already had serious problems, the response from almost everyone else was overwhelmingly positive,” re:Work reported. Those conversations were apparently informative not punitive because…
  4. Snarksters repentant. “Pretty much everyone we spoke with was appalled at their own behavior,” re:Work quoted Riot’s head of HR as saying. They didn’t know how they were coming across (what we can help our kids with, right?) and some said they wanted to be ” not just more considerate gamers but better people.” I suspect that the same would be true of younger people if they were given a chance to see mean online behavior from the perspective of someone else (who was informing not judging). How much do we give them that chance?

What happened after this experiment at the game company is exciting: Riot started working with MIT to study what makes up a great team and how the company could create some. Meanwhile, I followed a link in the re:Work piece to one about Google’s five criteria for successful teams. No. 1 is “psychological safety,” which is the antidote to the most pervasive online risk: social cruelty, from snark to cyberbullying. Creating a psychologically safe environment for play, learning, socializing, etc, a “community of guided practice” – a school, a family, an app, game or virtual world or a company – is the “Infrastructure” part of “the seven properties of safety” I proposed back in 2012. It’s the new frontier of Internet safety, the infrastructure that fosters kindness and civil counterspeech in community members (and communities), online and offline.

Share Button

Filed Under: cyberbullying, gaming, Parenting, Research, Risk & Safety, School & Tech, Social Media, videogames, Youth Tagged With: League of Legends, re:Work, Riot Games

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. Diigo Links (Weekly) | Another EducatorAl Blog says:
    February 17, 2018 at 11:30 pm

    […] Handling toxicity: Insights for parents & teachers from Riot Games – NetFamilyNews.org | N… […]

    Reply
  2. Diigo Links (weekly) | Mr. Gonzalez's Classroom says:
    June 27, 2016 at 3:24 pm

    […] Handling toxicity: Insights for parents & teachers from Riot Games – NetFamilyNews.org | N… […]

    Reply
  3. Handling toxicity: Insights for parents & teac… | EducatorAl's Tweets says:
    June 13, 2016 at 9:33 pm

    […] Handling toxicity: Insights for parents & teachers from Riot Games #edchat @annecollier netfamilynews.org/handling-toxic… […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

NFN in your in-box:

Anne Collier


Bio and my...
2016 TEDx Talk on
the heart of digital citizenship

Connect with me on LinkedIn
Follow me on MASTODON
Friend me on Facebook
See me on YouTube

IMPORTANT RESOURCES

Our (DIGITAL) PARENTING BASICS: Safety + Social
NAMLE, the National Association for Media Literacy Education
CASEL.org & the 5 core social-emotional competencies of SEL
Center for Democracy & Technology
Center for Innovative Public Health Research
Childnet International
Committee for Children
Congressional Internet Caucus Academy
ConnectSafely.org
Control Shift: a pivotal book for Internet safety
Crimes Against Children Research Center
Crisis Textline
Cyber Civil Rights Initiative's Revenge Porn Crisis Line
Cyberwise.org
danah boyd's blog and book about networked youth
Disconnected, Carrie James's book on digital ethics
FOSI.org's Good Digital Parenting
The research of Global Kids Online
The Good Project at Harvard's School of Education
If you watch nothing else: "Parenting in a Digital Age" TED Talk by Prof. Sonia Livingstone
The International Bullying Prevention Association
Let Grow Foundation
Making Caring Common
Raising Digital Natives, author Devorah Heitner's site
Renee Hobbs at the Media Education Lab
MediaSmarts.ca
The New Media Literacies
Report of the Aspen Task Force on Learning & the Internet and our guide to Creating Trusted Learning Environments
The Ruler Approach to social-emotional learning (Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence)
Sources of Strength
"Young & Online: Perspectives on life in a digital age" from young people in 26 countries (via UNICEF)
"Youth Safety on a Living Internet": 2010 report of the Online Safety & Technology Working Group (and my post about it)

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Safety by co-design: How we can take youth online safety to the next level
  • Much-less-social media on Facebook’s 20th birthday
  • What child online safety really needs, senators
  • Welcome to 2024!
  • Supporting the youngest witnesses of this humanitarian crisis
  • Should our kids learn how to use generative AI? Well…
  • The missing piece in US child online safety law
  • Generative AI: July 2023 freeze frame

Footer

Welcome to NetFamilyNews!

Founded as a nonprofit public service in 1999, NetFamilyNews quickly became the “community newspaper” of a vital interest community of subscribers in more than 50 countries. Site and newsletter became a blog in the early 2000s. Nowadays, you can subscribe in the box to the right to receive articles in your in-box as they're posted – or look for toots on Mastodon or posts on our Facebook page, LinkedIn and Medium.com. She welcomes your comments, follows and shares!

Categories

  • Home
  • Youth
  • Parenting
  • Literacy
  • Safety
  • Policy
  • Research

ABOUT

  • About NFN
  • Supporters
  • Anne Collier’s Bio
  • Copyright
  • Privacy

Search

Subscribe



THANKS TO NETFAMILYNEWS.ORG's SUPPORTER HOMESCHOOL CURRICULUM.
Copyright © 2025 ANNE COLLIER. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.