• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

NetFamilyNews.org

Kid tech intel for everybody

Show Search
Hide Search
  • Home
  • Youth
  • Parenting
  • Literacy
  • Safety
  • Policy
  • Research
  • About NetFamilyNews.org
    • Supporters
    • Anne Collier’s Bio
    • Copyright
    • Privacy

Major study on youth & media: Let’s take a closer look

January 21, 2010 By Anne 13 Comments

With its fresh, sweeping look at the media lives of US 8-to-18-year-olds, the Kaiser Family Foundation’s just-released “Generation M2” is a tremendous service to parents and educators – but also a subtle disservice. The latter, because it looks at kids’ and teens’ experiences with today’s media through the lens of yesterday’s, the mass-media culture we adults grew up in. “The story of media in young people’s lives today is primarily a story of technology facilitating increased consumption,” the authors write, even while a growing body of research shows that the youth-media story is actually more about sharing, playing with, and producing media, individually and collectively, than consuming it. But more on that in a moment. First, the findings….

1. The data

As “one of the largest and most comprehensive publicly available sources of information on the amount and nature of media use among American youth,” this is also Kaiser’s third such study (the first two were done in 1999 and 2004), so it shows usage trends. “Generation M2” also zooms in on individual media and devices, behaviors such as multimedia multitasking, and gender and ethnicity differences in the data. Here are some highlights:

  • Nothing but more (almost): Youth media consumption has grown from 6:21 hours/day five years ago to 7:38 today, and they now “pack a total of 10 hours and 45 minutes of media content into those 7.5 hours a day.” The breakdown: Movies and print, 0 growth; 47 more min./day for music/audio; 38 more min./day for “TV content”; 24 more min./day with videogames; and 27 more min./day on computers (though I’m not sure why computers are called media, when they’re more delivery devices). Age-wise, the biggest media-use growth spurt is “when children hit the 11-to-14-year-old age group,” when total media use goes up a whopping 4 hours a day (from 7:51 for kids 8-10 to 11:53 for those 11-14).
  • Much more mobile: All that growth in media use was “driven in large part by ready access to mobile devices like cell phones and iPods,” according to the study’s press release – cellphone ownership for 8-to-18-year-olds went from 39% to 66% and iPods and other music players from 18% to 76% for iPods and other MP3 players. Of course parents know that kids spend more time doing everything besides talking on their cellphones (games, music, photo-sharing, video-viewing, etc.: 49 min./day; talking 33 min./day). This study did not consider texting a form of media use, it says, but it did find that people in grades 7-12 spend an average of 1:35/day texting.
  • “Parental control”: About 30% of youth “say they have rules about how much time they can spend” with various media. But children who do have rules at their house spend almost 3 hours less time with media a day than those with no rules.
  • TV leads in more ways than 1: “TV remains the dominant type of media content consumed, at 4:29 a day,” and 64% of 8-to-18-year-olds “say the TV is usually on during meals; 45% say it’s on “most of the time”; 71% have a TV in their bedroom; 50% have a videogame console in their room. The authors did say that this latest study found for the first time that TV-viewing on *TV sets* went down 25 min./day between 2004 and ’09, but TV-viewing on other devices more than offset that decline: 24 min./day online; 16 a day on MP3 players; 15 a day on cellphones. “All told, 59% (2:39) of young people’s TV-viewing consists of live TV on a TV set, and 41% (1:50) is time-shifted, on DVDs, online, or mobile.]
  • Media use & grades: With the caveat that the study “cannot establish a cause and effect relationship between media use and grades,” the authors write that 47% of heavy media users (“the 21% of young people who consume more than 16 hours of media a day”) say they usually get “mostly Cs or lower,” compared to 23% of light users. [“Light users” are the 17% who consume less than 3 hours/day.] Book reading held steady over the past five years at about 25 min./day, but magazine and newspaper reading are both down (“from :14 to :09 for magazines and from :06 to :03 for newspapers”).
  • Favorite Net uses: In terms of time, social networking unsurprising topped the list (74% of people in grades 7-12 have profiles), but – surprising to me – they spent only 22 min./day at it, followed by gaming (17 min.) and checking out video sites (15 min.).
  • Girls & boys: Girls spend more time than boys in social sites (:25 vs. :19), listening to music (2:33 vs. 2:06), and reading (:43 vs. :33), but not by all that much. The real gap shows up in game playing and video use: console games (:56 boys vs. :14 girls), computer games (:25 vs. :08), and sites like YouTube (:17 vs. :12).

    2. Removing the mass-media filter

    So are we looking at all this data largely from the context of the media environment we grew up in, where media were consumed, professionally produced (much of it for entertainment), and government-regulated? As we read, are we worried that new media are just a waste of our kids’ time, a distraction, or even a potential health problem (Kaiser’s study appears in its “Media & Health” practice)? The Kaiser report is riddled with the words “consume” and “consumption,” when really what youth do so much more with media now is blog, share, post, text, discuss, remix, and produce, often collaboratively, as mentioned above. As sweeping as this study’s scope was, a study about their consumption is only a small part of today’s youth-media equation.

    The report refers to “screen media” vs. “print media,” when what can appear on that Net-connected screen is virtually all traditional media as well as the new, user-generated kind – because the Internet increasingly mirrors all of human life, the behavioral parts (from bullying to mentoring) as well as the consumables (from great literature to research to frat party photos) and creative productions (photos, tunes, videos, podcasts) are there too. Yet, when referring specifically to young people reading text on the screen, the report cites “the latest advice column on a fashion website or a classmate’s posting on a social networking site,” not peers’ blog posts, videos or other creations.

    This study wasn’t about the informal learning going on in social media, but that needs consideration in the context of youth media use. [A question asked in the 1999 Kaiser study – about whether time spent using the computer was mainly entertaining, killing time, or learning something – was in fact dropped for the next two studies (see pp. 46 and 47).] It’s important to keep in mind that extensive research into how youth use social media at home, in school, and in after-school programs shows that a lot of learning, not just entertainment, is going on in their media use. In its 2008 report, “Living and Learning with New Media,” the Digital Youth Project found that, “by exploring new interests, tinkering, and ‘messing around’ with new forms of media, [youth] acquire various forms of technical and media literacy…. By its immediacy and breadth of information, the digital world lowers barriers to self-directed learning.” In a paper on videogame-based learning, Digital Youth Project lead investigator, Dr. Mimi Ito, wrote last fall that “online groups mobilizing through games like World of Warcraft, [alternate-reality game] I Love Bees, or [virtual world] Whyville have demonstrated the possibilities of new forms of collaborative problem solving and collective action which exhibit properties of scientific inquiry.”

    Probably since the beginning of modern-day-style adolescence, parents have had to adjust to unnerving new kinds and uses of media, but today’s media shift is an order of magnitude different: Not only is it mobile, multimedia, multidirectional, user-produced, one-to-many, many-to-many, and many-to-one; it’s all mixed up with traditional, professionally produced media in the same “place” – the Internet, via proliferating devices – and it’s social and behavioral (see “Youth, adults & the social-media shift”). It’s asking a lot of us adults, so there’s a strange need for both patience (with ourselves and each other as we adjust) and urgency (to hurry up and adjust!). There’s also a need to be alert to mass-media biases in what we read about youth and social media and open to the positive as well as negative implications.

    Related links

  • “Kids pack in nearly 11 hours of media use daily,” by my ConnectSafely co-director, Larry Magid, at CNET and his audio interview with the study’s director Kaiser Family Foundation vice president Victoria Rideout, where she makes 2 interesting points: 1) how hard it is to categorize kids’ media use when it’s so fluid (it would be a lot easier if the study were youth-centric, not media- or tech-centric), and 2) how most of kids’ media use right now is what might be called passive and non-productive (which is no surprise when we block social media from school and leave them on their own in new media – see “School & social media: Uber big picture”).
  • “If Your Kids Are Awake, They’re Probably Online” in the New York Times, or did that headline writer mean watching TV, as the study actually suggests? The Times reports that “the study’s findings shocked its authors,” then cites the view of Boston pediatrician Michael Rich that it’s “time to stop arguing over whether it was good or bad and accept it as part of children’s environment.”
  • “Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project”
  • “Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-olds”
  • “Youth, adults & the social-media shift” here at NetFamilyNews
    Share Button
  • Filed Under: Research, Social Media, Youth Tagged With: Digital Youth Project, Generation M2, Kaiser Family Foundation

    Reader Interactions

    Comments

    1. Anne says

      February 11, 2010 at 4:02 pm

      Tx for your comment, Scott. I have such a hard time with adults working from the assumptions that play is a waste of time, that media use is all play, and therefore that all media use is rotting brains or wasting time. There's a great new book out – Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media – that challenges those assumptions with lots of examples of how young people are learning in and with social media. It's from MIT Press and has more than a dozen authors, the researchers of the Digital Youth Project. I think tech educators will find it very helpful for making cases and championing the use of 21st-century learning tools and media in school.

      Reply
    2. Scott says

      February 11, 2010 at 12:02 pm

      I think I've said it before here, Anne-I'm so happy that you are such a thoughtful reviewer because you do so much of the work I would have to do myself if you weren't! I second, heartily, your distinctions between media "consumption" and interactive participation, and I'm more than convinced by your basic premise that this study utilizes a filter based on outdated conceptions of what's really going on out there. Would that the question "about whether time spent using the computer was mainly entertaining, killing time, or learning something" were still being asked. That's the question I'd like to see answered. It also would beg a further question: Are kids "learning something" while gaming? While watching a video? While texting. Until we broaden or at least clarify our definitions of what learning is, we won't even be asking valuable questions.

      Reply
    3. Anne says

      January 22, 2010 at 1:58 pm

      Thanks for your kind comment, Kelly – I'm thrilled you're finding the post useful. Love what you're doing. I see school librarians as playing a critical role (wrote about that here).

      Reply
    4. Kelly Ahlfeld says

      January 22, 2010 at 11:13 am

      This is such a great summary and analysis of the study; I always enjoy your posts and appreciate your voice of reason! I will be using this post and referring to your site in an upcoming workshop for parents I'll be doing (I'm an elementary school librarian who has the good fortune to be the tech coordinator as well).

      thanks for the terrific contributions you make!

      Reply

    Trackbacks

    1. Youth privacy study: Should focus be only on parents' views? - Connect Safely says:
      April 29, 2013 at 10:41 pm

      […] and survey findings that reflect mostly past experience with media, privacy, and publicity (see this on last spring’s Kaiser Foundation study) – the views and understandings of a generation that grew up in a very different media […]

      Reply
    2. Teachers' views on how tech's changing students: Studies | NetFamilyNews.org says:
      November 12, 2012 at 12:58 pm

      […] are a blend of work and play for adults are just entertainment for youth? [A past much-publicized study of theirs represented children largely as media […]

      Reply
    3. What Net safety can learn from digital game design | NetFamilyNews.org says:
      September 12, 2012 at 1:12 am

      […] (think of all the studies that treat their screen time as mere entertainment – e.g., this, at best a waste of time, at worst dangerous). Think about it: Is this a helpful characterization […]

      Reply
    4. Social media: Time to end the laments & get on with it, maybe?! | NetFamilyNews.org says:
      May 23, 2011 at 7:58 pm

      […] Then we read statements like this from Bill Keller, who sounds like a latter-day Jefferson worrying about “the rabble”: “Basically, we are outsourcing our brains to the cloud. The upside is that this frees a lot of gray matter for important pursuits like FarmVille and ‘Real Housewives’.” A deliciously sarcastic reference to new media in which Keller sounds a lot like, not just Adams or Jefferson, but also a concerned Socrates. Last year, in Keller’s paper, author Jonah Lehrer reviewed Nicholas Carr’s book The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains, writing that, “in the ‘Phaedrus,’ [Socrates] lamented the invention of books, which ‘create forgetfulness’ in the soul. Instead of remembering for themselves, Socrates warned, new readers were blindly trusting in ‘external written characters.’ The library was ruining the mind.” Perhaps Keller skipped the review and just read the book. More modern examples of this tiresome angst were the 90 minutes PBS Frontline devoted to it last year (see this) and the Kaiser Foundation study on youth and media (and this). […]

      Reply
    5. Youth privacy study: Should we be focusing on parents’ views? | NetFamilyNews.org says:
      October 8, 2010 at 10:31 pm

      […] and survey findings that reflect mostly past experience with media, privacy, and publicity (see this on last spring’s Kaiser Foundation study) – the views and understandings of a generation that grew up in a very different media […]

      Reply
    6. The Net to youth: No big deal | NetFamilyNews.org says:
      September 14, 2010 at 2:50 pm

      […] to each activity creates a very false picture,” Dworschak writes, and that’s exactly what bothered me (besides its over-focus on media consumption) about the Kaiser media study last spring. Besides, […]

      Reply
    7. Developing self in the digital age | NetFamilyNews.org says:
      August 21, 2010 at 4:26 pm

      […] “Major study on youth & media: Let’s take a closer look” […]

      Reply
    8. Checking in on the media shift | NetFamilyNews.org says:
      May 21, 2010 at 4:05 pm

      […] “Major study on youth & media: Let’s take a closer look” […]

      Reply
    9. Teacher of the Year teaches with Facebook | NetFamilyNews.org says:
      April 30, 2010 at 5:49 pm

      […] which are so compelling to their students that they use them all the time outside of school (see this). [The contrast between students' in-school and extracurricular use of participatory tech and media […]

      Reply

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Primary Sidebar

    NFN in your in-box:

    Anne Collier


    Bio and my...
    2016 TEDx Talk on
    the heart of digital citizenship

    Subscribe to my
    RSS feed
    Follow me on Twitter or even better:
    NEW: Follow me on MASTODON!
    Friend me on Facebook
    See me on YouTube

    IMPORTANT RESOURCES

    Our (DIGITAL) PARENTING BASICS: Safety + Social
    NAMLE, the National Association for Media Literacy Education
    CASEL.org & the 5 core social-emotional competencies of SEL
    Center for Democracy & Technology
    Center for Innovative Public Health Research
    Childnet International
    Committee for Children
    Congressional Internet Caucus Academy
    ConnectSafely.org
    Control Shift: a pivotal book for Internet safety
    Crimes Against Children Research Center
    Crisis Textline
    Cyber Civil Rights Initiative's Revenge Porn Crisis Line
    Cyberwise.org
    danah boyd's blog and book about networked youth
    Disconnected, Carrie James's book on digital ethics
    FOSI.org's Good Digital Parenting
    The research of Global Kids Online
    The Good Project at Harvard's School of Education
    If you watch nothing else: "Parenting in a Digital Age" TED Talk by Prof. Sonia Livingstone
    The International Bullying Prevention Association
    Let Grow Foundation
    Making Caring Common
    Raising Digital Natives, author Devorah Heitner's site
    Renee Hobbs at the Media Education Lab
    MediaSmarts.ca
    The New Media Literacies
    Report of the Aspen Task Force on Learning & the Internet and our guide to Creating Trusted Learning Environments
    The Ruler Approach to social-emotional learning (Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence)
    Sources of Strength
    "Young & Online: Perspectives on life in a digital age" from young people in 26 countries (via UNICEF)
    "Youth Safety on a Living Internet": 2010 report of the Online Safety & Technology Working Group (and my post about it)

    Categories

    Recent Posts

    • A solution for ‘awful but lawful’
    • New global service for getting nudes off the Internet
    • Then there’s the flip side of ChatGPT
    • For SID 2023: What youth want ‘online safety’ to teach
    • ChatGPT for media literacy training
    • Future safety: Content moderators and digital grassroots justice
    • Mental health 2023, Part 1: Youth on algorithms
    • Where did my Twitter go? And other end-of-2022 notes

    Footer

    Welcome to NetFamilyNews!

    Founded as a nonprofit public service in 1999, NetFamilyNews quickly became the “community newspaper” of a vital interest community of subscribers in more than 50 countries. Site and newsletter became a blog in the early 2000s. Nowadays, you can subscribe in the box to the right to receive articles in your in-box as they're posted – or look for tweets, posts on our Facebook page, and key commentaries from Anne on her page at Medium.com. She welcomes your comments, follows and shares!

    Categories

    • Home
    • Youth
    • Parenting
    • Literacy
    • Safety
    • Policy
    • Research

    ABOUT

    • About NFN
    • Supporters
    • Anne Collier’s Bio
    • Copyright
    • Privacy

    Search

    Subscribe



    THANKS TO NETFAMILYNEWS.ORG's SUPPORTER HOMESCHOOL CURRICULUM.
    Copyright © 2023 ANNE COLLIER. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.