• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

NetFamilyNews.org

Kid tech intel for everybody

Show Search
Hide Search
  • Home
  • Youth
  • Parenting
  • Literacy
  • Safety
  • Policy
  • Research
  • About NetFamilyNews.org
    • Supporters
    • Anne Collier’s Bio
    • Copyright
    • Privacy

‘Juvenoia,’ Part 1: Why Internet fear is overrated

March 30, 2011 By Anne 33 Comments

Referred to variously as technopanic, predator panic, cyberbullying panic, etc., a lot of fear and anxiety has developed around the intersection of youth and the Internet. Very interestingly, last fall David Finkelhor – director of the University of New Hampshire’s Crimes Against Children Research Center (CCRC) and lead author of the US’s first national study on youth risk online in 2000 – used the term “juvenoia” in his recent groundbreaking talk, “The Internet, Youth Deviance & the Problem of Juvenoia.” He defined juvenoia as “the exaggerated fear of the influence of social change [including the Internet] on youth.” This week, the first of a two-part series on Dr. Finkelhor’s talk: why the fear is unsupported by the evidence and (next week) why all the fear.

It’s one thing to say that the Internet has dangers on it; it’s a very different thing to say that the Internet increases dangers, David Finkelhor said early in his talk. The problem is, that second view has become the dominant narrative in the public discussion about young people online. The “risk-promotion narrative,” he also calls it, doesn’t say that “when kids go online bad things can happen because they can happen anywhere,” like in a city – which of course is true. What the narrative says instead, and incorrectly, is that “intrinsic features of the Internet increase risk and augment vulnerability.”

On the contrary: “The remarkable and jarring thing” about the risk-promotion narrative’s development, Finkelhor said, is that, in the very period the Net has become pervasive – the past 15 years – “we’ve been observing a dramatically contradictory, positive pattern to the social problem indicators … including many you’d expect to be canaries in the coal mine, if it were indeed the case that this mass migration of young people into the technological world were really having such a corrupting and deviance-amplifying influence on them.” [Kids’ Internet adoption was about 20% higher than adults’ during that period, he said.]

Wide range of positive indicators

Here are a number of the positive social indicators Finkelhor pointed out in his slides showing the trending graph for each one (starting at about 8:15 into the talk), and these are not all the positive indicators, he said:

  • Sexual abuse of minors is down (58% from 1992 to 2008, he wrote in this 2010 CCRC article).
  • Teen sexual intercourse and pregnancy are down.
  • Bullying is down (see this), as is the number of kids reporting getting into physical fights.
  • The number of kids reporting being targeted by hate speech is down.
  • The teen suicide rate “has dropped dramatically.”
  • The number of teens who say they comtemplated suicide or felt sad or hopeless is down.
  • The number of crimes committed by young people has “gone down dramatically in the United States.”
  • School violence is down.
  • Teen drug use is down too.

Areas Finkelhor mentioned where the numbers go up are child obesity and children living in poverty. He’s not suggesting these indicators are a rigorous test of the hypothesis that the Internet is a risk-amplifier, but “it’s really just a hypothesis, still must be proven, and doesn’t have a lot of evidence to support it,” he said. But, he pointedly asks, “can a huge social change like the Internet occur, have such a negative influence on them … and have none of that toxicity show up in the major social indicators?”

In fact, he has “this intuition that we’re going to look back on this period as one of major and widespread amelioration of social problems affecting children and families” (emphasis mine).

Net as a risk reducer

So he’s putting forth a very different hypothesis: that the Internet just might be protective. “Maybe, on balance, it’s deviance-dampening rather than deviance-amplifying,” Finkelhor said. “The movement in all [the above] indicators suggests that this hypothesis deserves consideration.”

So how could the Net be protective? Here are some features of the Net revolution that could be antidotes to behavioral and social problems (you’ll want to hear his full descriptions, starting at about 17:15 into the talk):

  • Reduction of boredom and alienation – the Internet is engaging to kids; it may help distract them from negative emotional states; those who don’t feel a sense of mastery in other environments may feel mastery online….
  • Changing patterns of independence exploration – armchair adventuring; the actual risks/dangers may be less immediate online; on the Internet, a few more steps need to occur before things happen, “interactions are more drawn out, given to less impulsiveness”
  • Increased deviance detection – the offense, whatever it is, has a trail of evidence; bullying becomes not just a rumor or hearsay; maybe because of anxiety lots of parents are having more norms-improving discussions with kids than they’ve had before.
  • Surveillance effect – we’ve all had to abdicate some degree of privacy, but that may not be all bad; the knowledge you can be tracked has discouraged deviance as well. It allows parents to be more in touch with children and children with one another, which might reduce some kinds of dangers.

“It’s very possible things got better for young people in spite of the Internet,” not because of it, Finkelhor said – “it’s all very speculative right now. But I like throwing these out to move the discussion forward.”

The resurgence of ‘stranger danger’ fears

“The current Internet juvenoia has been an occasion for the resurgence of this worrisome stranger-danger paradigm,” Finkelhor said. And yet one of criminology’s really big breakthroughs of the last generation was the insight of how much harm occurs at the hands of “intimates and offenders known to children … and how little harm is at the hand of strangers. In spite of broad scientific consensus on this, it’s a hard one to sustain in public perception…. Strangers are always easier to demonize than friends and family,” he adds, referring to the “not in my family” or my school or my place of worship kind of denial that human nature clings to. So unfortunately for the vast majority of youth (and adults) who are having good or neutral experiences online, and unfortunately for sound policymaking, the Internet is demonized because “stranger-danger will always find a way to assert itself” and the Internet revolution is its new focus.

Not saying there’s no danger

Finally, Finkelhor clarifies, “I’m not saying that all talk about Internet danger is hype. I do think there are dangers on the Internet. We need to understand them, prevent them, and eliminate them, and I’m fully supportive of an active police presence online, of hotlines, of putting pressure on Internet service providers, and of social networking sites minimizing risk through site architecture” and terms of use enforcement. But…

“We only need to know that there are dangers in order to warrant this kind of [mitigation] activity. But we don’t have to argue that the Net is especially dangerous,” Finkelhor said, “any more than we have to argue that Portsmouth, N.H., is especially dangerous in order to have law enforcement there. It’s a relatively safe city, but there’s crime and social problems there, so we do something about that.”

Two other needs he proposes which I’d love to see met soon: “healthy skepticism about claims that the lot of children is changing for the worse” and “a high standard for what we accept as evidence in that regard.”

Next week… ‘Juvenoia’ Part 2, the $64k question: So why are we afraid?

Share Button

Filed Under: Research, Risk & Safety Tagged With: Crimes Against Children Research Center, David Finkelhor, juvenoia, predator panic, youth online risk

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Joe says

    April 10, 2011 at 2:09 pm

    I believe that parenting is on the downward spiral as parents (many of which are too caught up in themselves) neglect their children’s socialization more than ever before… I’m not talking about “good parents” that are engaged and hands on, rather a majority of parents that simply are too busy and too intimidated by new technologies to understand that children become what they surround themselves with.  In doing 100s of internet safety and digital ethics presentations to parent groups, I find myself talking to groups that are concerned, but are a very small percentage of a schools’ parent base.

    That said, with pregnancy rates, down, vandalism rates down, youth crime rates down, drug use down, I think that the kids themselves are doing a good job of understanding societal “values”.
    It’s almost as if the kids are realizing THEY are the experts(I tell then this) and they are beginning to become more responsible. At the same time, the privacy issues, and urge to “share” their world is getting them into trouble as they post their social lives(not realizing some HR hiriing person will be looking at it a year or two from now).

    I’m also promoting Prensky’s digital human mindset of late. We are all in this together… partnerships between natives and immigrants are better then the barrier or call out of the differences. We are stakeholders just as our children are… together we accomplish more (wait, I think i’ve used that before)…

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. ChatGPT for media literacy training - NetFamilyNews.org says:
    February 6, 2023 at 2:37 pm

    […] Center, coined the term “juvenoia” and gave a talk on the subject I wrote about here and here. He later wrote about online safety’s “three alarmist […]

    Reply
  2. Why partner with teens on tech: Great new book - NetFamilyNews.org says:
    September 19, 2022 at 4:10 am

    […] panic effects: About the current moral panic’s first decade or so: “Juvenoia, Part 1” and “…Part 2” (a term coined by Prof. David Finkelhor at University of New Hampshire) and […]

    Reply
  3. About 'Momo' & dealing with viral media scares - NetFamilyNews.org says:
    November 16, 2021 at 3:58 am

    […] was “the exaggerated fear of the influence of social change [including technology] on youth.” Here’s more on […]

    Reply
  4. How to Not Fall for Viral Scares - Seasonal Guide To Everything says:
    June 9, 2019 at 6:13 pm

    […] and Twitter. The disconnect between how the olds and their children use the internet leads to parental anxiety, and in the case of this week’s resurfacing of the viral fake Momo challenge, panic and […]

    Reply
  5. How to Not Fall for Viral Scares Like Momo – DA: Techout says:
    March 21, 2019 at 10:22 am

    […] and Twitter. The disconnect between how the olds and their children use the internet leads to parental anxiety, and in the case of this week’s resurfacing of the viral fake Momo challenge, panic and […]

    Reply
  6. How to Not Fall for Viral Scares – Todays Healthy Lifestyle says:
    March 16, 2019 at 1:42 am

    […] Facebook and Twitter. The unplug between how the olds and their children use the internet leads to parental anxiety, and in the case of this week’s resurfacing of the viral sham Momo challenge, anxiety and […]

    Reply
  7. How to Not Fall for Viral Scares Like Momo | IRAWE says:
    March 2, 2019 at 12:26 am

    […] and Twitter. The disconnect between how the olds and their children use the internet leads to parental anxiety, and in the case of this week’s resurfacing of the viral fake Momo challenge, panic and […]

    Reply
  8. How to Not Fall for Viral Scares – EMILY DREYFUSS CULTURE 02.28.19 07:48 PM | Just Sayin' says:
    March 1, 2019 at 3:18 am

    […] and Twitter. The disconnect between how the olds and their children use the internet leads to parental anxiety, and in the case of this week’s resurfacing of the viral fake Momo challenge, panic and […]

    Reply
  9. How to Not Fall for Viral Scares - National Hill says:
    February 28, 2019 at 10:40 pm

    […] and Twitter. The disconnect between how the olds and their children use the internet leads to parental anxiety, and in the case of this week’s resurfacing of the viral fake Momo challenge, panic and […]

    Reply
  10. Hexbyte Tech News Wired How to Not Fall for Viral Scares Like Momo - HexByte Inc. says:
    February 28, 2019 at 9:13 pm

    […] and Twitter. The disconnect between how the olds and their children use the internet leads to parental anxiety, and in the case of this week’s resurfacing of the viral fake Momo challenge, panic and […]

    Reply
  11. Win out how to Now not Fall for Viral Scares Like Momo - WIRED - The Tech Sensei says:
    February 28, 2019 at 9:11 pm

    […] Fb and Twitter. The disconnect between how the olds and their kids exercise the on-line results in parental terror, and within the case of this week’s resurfacing of the viral unfaithful Momo danger, dismay and […]

    Reply
  12. How to Not Fall for Viral Scares Like Momo - Pathways.edu.np says:
    February 28, 2019 at 7:13 pm

    […] and Twitter. The disconnect between how the olds and their children use the internet leads to parental anxiety, and in the case of this week’s resurfacing of the viral fake Momo challenge, panic and […]

    Reply
  13. How to Not Fall for Viral Scares Like Momo | IDM NEWS says:
    February 28, 2019 at 6:23 pm

    […] and Twitter. The disconnect between how the olds and their children use the internet leads to parental anxiety, and in the case of this week’s resurfacing of the viral fake Momo challenge, panic and […]

    Reply
  14. How to Not Fall for Viral Scares Like Momo | NewsErupt says:
    February 28, 2019 at 5:33 pm

    […] and Twitter. The disconnect between how the olds and their children use the internet leads to parental anxiety, and in the case of this week’s resurfacing of the viral fake Momo challenge, panic and […]

    Reply
  15. How to Not Fall for Viral Scares Like Momo - aka.COOL says:
    February 28, 2019 at 5:26 pm

    […] and Twitter. The disconnect between how the olds and their children use the internet leads to parental anxiety, and in the case of this week’s resurfacing of the viral fake Momo challenge, panic and […]

    Reply
  16. How to Not Fall for Viral Scares Like Momo – SimpleNews says:
    February 28, 2019 at 5:20 pm

    […] on Facebook and Twitter. The disconnect between how the olds and their kids use the web leads to parental anxiety, and within the case of this week’s resurfacing of the viral faux Momo problem, panic and […]

    Reply
  17. How to Not Fall for Viral Scares Like Momo says:
    February 28, 2019 at 5:00 pm

    […] and Twitter. The disconnect between how the olds and their children use the internet leads to parental anxiety, and in the case of this week’s resurfacing of the viral fake Momo challenge, panic and […]

    Reply
  18. UK children's ChildLine: Read the coverage carefully | NetFamilyNews.org says:
    January 10, 2014 at 8:03 am

    […] in 2010, Dr. Finkelhor coined the term “juvenoia”: my post about Dr. Finkelor’s 2010 talk and paper on the subject where he cites a wide range […]

    Reply
  19. Though reports about bullying are increasing , the behavior itself is not | Dream Something says:
    June 5, 2013 at 10:10 pm

    […] The rise of social media is another thing people don’t typically think of as a positive force in society. But consider this point from Finkelhor: “These technologies may have dampened crime and bullying by providing more ways of summoning help, more forms of social surveillance, and engrossing activities that undermine forms of alienation that lead to crime” (more on that here). […]

    Reply
  20. Teens, social media & trolls: Toxic mix | NetFamilyNews.org says:
    November 1, 2012 at 8:23 pm

    […] dramatically.” The new data’s showing the improvements to be holding steady – see this about a talk Dr. Finkelhor gave about this two years ago. Permalink Post a comment — […]

    Reply
  21. Kids & teens not only ok, but smart!: Study | NetFamilyNews.org says:
    September 26, 2012 at 9:29 pm

    […] a stranger, and stalked.” [This misinformation is called education? See how inaccurate it is here.] And how sad, because – even though “they demonstrated strong resilience when it came to […]

    Reply
  22. Declines in 2 online risks for youth: Study | NetFamilyNews.org says:
    December 16, 2011 at 2:58 pm

    […] bulleted list from one of the latest study’s authors at the CCRC, David Finkelhor, in “‘Juvenoia,’ Part 1: Why Internet fear is overrated.” Permalink Post a comment — Trackback URI RSS 2.0 feed for these comments This […]

    Reply
  23. From Europe, Top 10 online-risk myths | NetFamilyNews.org says:
    October 10, 2011 at 3:40 pm

    […] “‘Juvenoia,’ Part 1: Why Internet fear is overrated” […]

    Reply
  24. Juvenoia | National Cyber Security says:
    September 6, 2011 at 5:37 pm

    […] Collier’s Why fear is overrated (part one and part […]

    Reply
  25. Study falsely reinforces fear for parents of online youth | LocatePC | Locate your stolen computer or stolen laptop - Works for both Mac and PC says:
    September 6, 2011 at 9:40 am

    […] ConnectSafely.org co-director Anne Collier two part series (part one and part two) on “juvenoia”and Anne’s analysis of the CASA youth […]

    Reply
  26. Study falsely reinforces fear for parents of online youth | Safety Village says:
    September 5, 2011 at 5:21 pm

    […] alarming news report.More resourcesMy ConnectSafely.org co-director Anne Collier two part series (part one and part two) on “juvenoia”and Anne’sanalysis of the CASA youthsurveyMy slide presentation […]

    Reply
  27. Juvenoia | Safety Village says:
    August 31, 2011 at 12:23 pm

    […] Internet, Youth Safetyand the Problem of “JuvenoiaAnne Collier’s Why fear is overrated (part one and part two)Larry Magid’s slideshow: Do fear and exaggeration increase […]

    Reply
  28. Net use may be making us nicer: Studies | NetFamilyNews.org says:
    August 17, 2011 at 2:39 pm

    […] was invented and experienced its fastest growth (see the bulleted list of nine social indicators in my post about his talk). [Finkelhor is the director of the University of New Hampshire's Crimes Against Children Research […]

    Reply
  29. Next step: Crowd-source digital citizenship | NetFamilyNews.org says:
    July 28, 2011 at 7:01 pm

    […] made “predator” a household word and associates youth with victimization (see this on “juvenoia”) – but in the mashup of online and offline that is our lives now, as we socialize, learn, play, […]

    Reply
  30. Portmanteaus: juvenoia « Arnold Zwicky's Blog says:
    June 28, 2011 at 11:48 pm

    […] On NetFamilyNews: Referred to variously as technopanic, predator panic, cyberbullying panic, etc., a lot of fear and anxiety has developed around the intersection of youth and the Internet. …last fall David Finkelhor – director of the University of New Hampshire’s Crimes Against Children Research Center (CCRC) and lead author of the US’s first national study on youth risk online in 2000 – used the term “juvenoia” in his recent groundbreaking talk, “The Internet, Youth Deviance & the Problem of Juvenoia.” He defined juvenoia as “the exaggerated fear of the influence of social change [including the Internet] on youth.” This week, the first of a two-part series on Dr. Finkelhor’s talk: why the fear is unsupported by the evidence and (next week) why all the fear. […]

    Reply
  31. Predator Panic Making a Comeback | Find to Us says:
    June 1, 2011 at 1:59 am

    […] For more on this issue, please see Anne Collier’s NetFamilyNews post ‘Juvenoia,’ Part 1: Why Internet fear is overrated […]

    Reply
  32. e.politics: online advocacy tools & tactics » Quick Hits — May 10, 2011 says:
    May 11, 2011 at 3:27 am

    […] ‘Juvenoia,’ Part 1: Why Internet fear is overrated. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

NFN in your in-box:

Anne Collier


Bio and my...
2016 TEDx Talk on
the heart of digital citizenship

Subscribe to my
RSS feed
Follow me on Twitter or even better:
NEW: Follow me on MASTODON!
Friend me on Facebook
See me on YouTube

IMPORTANT RESOURCES

Our (DIGITAL) PARENTING BASICS: Safety + Social
NAMLE, the National Association for Media Literacy Education
CASEL.org & the 5 core social-emotional competencies of SEL
Center for Democracy & Technology
Center for Innovative Public Health Research
Childnet International
Committee for Children
Congressional Internet Caucus Academy
ConnectSafely.org
Control Shift: a pivotal book for Internet safety
Crimes Against Children Research Center
Crisis Textline
Cyber Civil Rights Initiative's Revenge Porn Crisis Line
Cyberwise.org
danah boyd's blog and book about networked youth
Disconnected, Carrie James's book on digital ethics
FOSI.org's Good Digital Parenting
The research of Global Kids Online
The Good Project at Harvard's School of Education
If you watch nothing else: "Parenting in a Digital Age" TED Talk by Prof. Sonia Livingstone
The International Bullying Prevention Association
Let Grow Foundation
Making Caring Common
Raising Digital Natives, author Devorah Heitner's site
Renee Hobbs at the Media Education Lab
MediaSmarts.ca
The New Media Literacies
Report of the Aspen Task Force on Learning & the Internet and our guide to Creating Trusted Learning Environments
The Ruler Approach to social-emotional learning (Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence)
Sources of Strength
"Young & Online: Perspectives on life in a digital age" from young people in 26 countries (via UNICEF)
"Youth Safety on a Living Internet": 2010 report of the Online Safety & Technology Working Group (and my post about it)

Categories

Recent Posts

  • A solution for ‘awful but lawful’
  • New global service for getting nudes off the Internet
  • Then there’s the flip side of ChatGPT
  • For SID 2023: What youth want ‘online safety’ to teach
  • ChatGPT for media literacy training
  • Future safety: Content moderators and digital grassroots justice
  • Mental health 2023, Part 1: Youth on algorithms
  • Where did my Twitter go? And other end-of-2022 notes

Footer

Welcome to NetFamilyNews!

Founded as a nonprofit public service in 1999, NetFamilyNews quickly became the “community newspaper” of a vital interest community of subscribers in more than 50 countries. Site and newsletter became a blog in the early 2000s. Nowadays, you can subscribe in the box to the right to receive articles in your in-box as they're posted – or look for tweets, posts on our Facebook page, and key commentaries from Anne on her page at Medium.com. She welcomes your comments, follows and shares!

Categories

  • Home
  • Youth
  • Parenting
  • Literacy
  • Safety
  • Policy
  • Research

ABOUT

  • About NFN
  • Supporters
  • Anne Collier’s Bio
  • Copyright
  • Privacy

Search

Subscribe



THANKS TO NETFAMILYNEWS.ORG's SUPPORTER HOMESCHOOL CURRICULUM.
Copyright © 2023 ANNE COLLIER. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.